Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 07:35 |
- sorry no time now, but a search for births under Free BMD as Coleran or as Colleran between 1890 and 1920 in Lancashire gives patterns of births that might be tied in via marriages to the various families in the area in 1918
- will have another look later
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 07:05 |
1861 census:
Name: Martin Colloran Age: 4 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1857 Relation: Son Mother's Name: Anna Gender: Male Where born: Liverpool, Lancashire, England
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 06:58 |
1881/1861 census
born abt 1825/1831 Ireland, married to Julia, living in Ormskirk
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 06:57 |
-marriage Dec 52 Ormskirk - marriage Jun 64 Preston - marriage 1918 Wigan (as mentioned above)
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 06:54 |
Now the other mentions that don't fit the Bury/Rochdale/Heywood area:
Birth Sep 1855 Liverpool Death Sep 1876 Liverpool (b abt 1852)
[ Ed: poss the Martin son of Anna on the 1861 census (see posting on page 6 below)]
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 06:51 |
- and birth registered Dec 1865 Bury (on Ancestry as Collern)
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 06:48 |
- and Martin in 1881:
Name: Martin Colleran Age: 14 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1867 Relation: Son Mother's Name: Monica Gender: Male Where born: Heywood, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Heap County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address: 7 Hampsons Ter
View Image Occupation: Cotton Mule Piecer Registration district: Bury Sub-registration district: Heywood ED, institution, or vessel: 8b
Household Members: Name Age Martin Colleran 14 Monica Colleran 34
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 06:43 |
- and Martin and Mary in 1901:
Name: Martin Colleran Age: 36 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1865 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: Heywood, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Heywood Ecclesiastical parish: Heywood St Luke County/Island: Lancashire Country: England
Registration district: Bury Sub-registration district: Heywood ED, institution, or vessel: 9
Household schedule number: 69 Household Members: Name Age John Colleran 17 son b Bury Joseph Colleran 10 son b Heywood Martin Colleran 36 head carter born Heywood Mary Colleran 42 wife cotton waste picker born Liverpool Mary Colleran 7 daughter b Heywood Winnifred Colleran 4 daughter b Heywood
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 06:35 |
Martin and Mary possibly in 1891:
Name: Martin Colloton (image looks more like Colleron) Age: 25 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1866 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: Heywood, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Castleton Ecclesiastical parish: St Martin Town: Heywood County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Rochdale Sub-registration district: Castleton Further ED, institution, or vessel: 3
Household Members: Name Age Joseph Colloton 6/12 son born Heywood Martin Colloton 25 genl labr Mary Colloton 34 wife cotton sorter born Liverpool John Hanlan 7 stepson born Bury
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2007 06:25 |
Hi Billy
Thanks for the witnesses' names.
Martin Colleran has the rarer name and may be easier to find. Ancestry has very few individuals with this name, even using the soundex option.
There are just two of that name on the England 1901 census with connections to Lancashire - both born about 1865 in Heywood, which has an Oldham postcode and is roughly equidistant between Bury and Rochdale. I do wonder if it is actually just one individual, enumerated twice - once by his wife, and once at the place he stayed overnight.
A Martin Colaran married in Rochdale in Sep 1866, and there is a Martin Colleran marriage in Rochdale in 1890.
However, there are other places linked to the name - Wigan (about 20 miles further west) Ormskirk (another 10 miles still further west) and Preston (north of Wigan).
Martin Colleran married Delia Freyne in Wigan in Mar 1918
I'll check those 1901 census references.
|
|
Billy
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 21:00 |
I cant believe the response that i have had and all so informative, can i just thank everybody that has posted i appreciate all this hard work very much. xxx The witnesses on the Marriage cert are:
Martin Colleran Catherine Burns
|
|
Katwin
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 20:52 |
Hi Billy,
Like Stan I believe you can be reasonably assured in sending for the birth entry of Daniel Ingham born in Blackburn in 1873 December quarter, 8e 319 as that of your grandfather.
You have been given some excellent advice here, and if you take one step at a time, his birth is the most logical place to start.
To send for certificates online go to - http://www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/certificates/login.asp - you will need to register with your e-mail address and a password. A certificate costs £7 and they are not too busy this time of year!
Good luck,
Kathy
|
|
Stan
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 19:45 |
Hi Billy
As there was only one Daniel Ingham born in Blackburn between 1865 and 1885, I think it is reasonable to conclude he is yours - born Oct-Dec 1873, Blackburn 8e 319. I would be surprised if that were the wrong person. He also happens to be the first one born after 1865 anyway.
Edith Mercer is the harder one to find, in fact. Her father's name could be made up, of course, to avoid a blank space on the form if she were illegitimate, as well as her age being wrong. I think the quest is do-able, albeit at some cost in time, and possibly in abortive certificates. There was even an Edith Claire, or Clara, Mercer born in Blackburn in 1886 (Jan-Mar 1886, Blackburn 8e 397), although her father is Robert, an ironmonger.
Regards
Stan
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 18:28 |
Apologies Billy,
I don't think I've added anything useful this afternoon.
If you can post those witnesses, that may be very helpful.
Logging off for now.
All the best
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 18:13 |
Hi Stan,
Here is a possible in 1891 for the Edith Mercer aged 13 in 1901:
Name: Arthur Mercer Age: 1 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1890 Relation: Son Father's Name: Francis Mother's Name: Alice Gender: Male Where born: Newton; Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Newton Ecclesiastical parish: St Luke County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Employment status: View Image Registration district: Prestwich Sub-registration district: Newton ED, institution, or vessel: 18 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Albert H Mercer 8 Alice Mercer 32 Arthur Mercer 1 Edith J Mercer 3 Emily Mercer 11 Francis Mercer 33 Francis Mercer 6 Is it possible to rule this one out as the child in the institution in 1901? Comments welcome
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 18:09 |
Hi Billy
Just quickly posting one further 1901 possibility - an Edith May Mercer:
Name: Edith May Mercer Age: 6 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1895 Relation: Granddaughter Father's Name: John Mother's Name: Elizabeth A Gender: Female Where born: Blackburn, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Blackburn Ecclesiastical parish: Nova Scotia All Saints County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Employment status: View Image Registration district: Blackburn Sub-registration district: Blackburn, Northern ED, institution, or vessel: 34
Household schedule number: 114 Household Members: Name Age Edith May Mercer 6 granddaughter Elizabeth A Mercer 27 daughter in law James E Mercer 22 son, single John Mercer 64 head John Mercer 26 son (married) Lettice Mercer 24 daughter, single Marcy Mercer 61 wife Selina Mercer 20 daughter, single Ellen Sellers 67 sister in law, single (edit: this too does not look likely - I wondered if John might be John William, born around 1875, and although there are two John William birth registrations in Blackburn in 1875/6, checking the 1881 census shows that this John is neither of these)
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 18:05 |
Hi Billy,
I've just realised that I may have misled everyone with an earlier post of mine. I've gone back and posted an edit to it, but it is worth saying here too.
Your information on Edith is just that - not Edith Ann. So not only could all the various Edith Mercers be possibilities, but also people such as Edith May, Edith Alice etc etc.
I am very sorry to have misled people (although I think some people were aware that there were wider possiblities).
Will try to be more careful in future!
All the best
|
|
RobG
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 18:05 |
Kathy,
Further to your earlier reply, the copy received from the GRO isn't a photocopy of the original cert, merely a photocopy of the original transcription, as the actual original is retained at the local office. Whilst some local offices do give a new transcription, others give a copy of the original cert.
Rob
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 18:02 |
Hi Stan
Could you stay around for a few minutes longer? I've briefly looked at the thirtenn year old - and I'm meaning to find her in 1891 since she is there with her two brothers - Arthur would be just 1 in 1891 so may be findable....
(just making amends first)
|
|
Stan
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2007 17:49 |
Ivy, your post is quite interesting. However Robert Mercer married Mary Jane Bellfield Jul-Sep 1892, Oldham 8d 894. So not John William as the father I am afraid. There is an Edith Mercer in an institution in 1901, aged 13. I didn't look up the details, and finding her back in 1891 will be tricky, but she would be right for the age at death I found.
Regards
Stan
|