Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
I don't know what to do next Updated.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
(¯`*•.¸ (¯`*•.¸Valerie¸. | Report | 18 Mar 2008 00:20 |
Hi Kate |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 18 Mar 2008 00:12 |
Could be that when he married in 1899 he told the vicar he was a bachelor (or the vicar assumed he was) - perhaps he had told his wife-to-be that he was a bachelor and had to go along with the lie on the wedding certificate/ |
|||
|
(¯`*•.¸ (¯`*•.¸Valerie¸. | Report | 17 Mar 2008 23:59 |
I have had Thomas's marriage cert for three months now and am still no nearer to finding his birth reg.! Marriage cert states:- |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 23 Nov 2007 18:49 |
may be he married a much younger wife!!!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
(¯`*•.¸ (¯`*•.¸Valerie¸. | Report | 23 Nov 2007 12:26 |
Hi All thanks for all your input on this I will be going to the local office in next few days to order the cert. The worst part was 36years old in 1901 and 28 in 1891 and if he was born in 58/59 he would have been 42 !!and I thought only women lied about their ages !!! LOL Thanks again everyone Val |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 23 Nov 2007 10:32 |
Bear in mind, also, that birth registration wasn't compulsory until 1875...........so the birth may simply not have been registered. |
|||
|
MrsBucketBouquet | Report | 23 Nov 2007 10:19 |
Handy to keep... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 23 Nov 2007 01:16 |
Val, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
(¯`*•.¸ (¯`*•.¸Valerie¸. | Report | 23 Nov 2007 01:02 |
Thank you Gwyneth for your reply. All the time I have looked at this problem I hadn't thought about the marriage cert side of it until I was typing this out.This is probably the best way to go . Thanks again for your reply I must go to bed now, but find I do my best thinking late at night. |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 23 Nov 2007 00:48 |
I would buy a copy of the marriage certificate which you know is definitely the correct Thomas...ie. the marriage to your direct ancestor in 1899. |
|||
|
(¯`*•.¸ (¯`*•.¸Valerie¸. | Report | 23 Nov 2007 00:42 |
I am about to order a birth cert for my gt grandfather Thomas Jarman born Llanidloes mont.My problem is this his birth year changes on the census. |