Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
SORTED THANKS to all
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Heather | Report | 16 Nov 2007 14:05 |
Yes Id have thought all those bits of info would point to John being Irish. |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:48 |
That's interesting. The William I have down as first born is a William Patrick. Sounds like it could well be them don't you think? |
|||
|
Maisy | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:46 |
This could be them on 1891 census |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:35 |
They were married in Ireland of all places. Can you believe that?!!! it doesn't help me does it? |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:34 |
The child was born Mildred Agnes Martin. She was not illigitimate and Sarah died a Martin as it states that on her headstone. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:33 |
Have you got the marriage cert for Sarah and John? |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:31 |
The fact that another child was born in 1903 does not actually prove that Sarah was not widowed.......... |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:20 |
That is her full Maiden name. She had no middle name given to her. Her mother was born Sarah Ann Mockford. The reason why I want to see the census is to confirm where John Martin was born and his correst birth year. |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:18 |
There was another sibling born in 1903 so Sarah wouldn't have been widowed. |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:17 |
The dates of their births - the parents, particularly dad is quite mature for a first marriage? |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:16 |
Found these...........1901 |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:16 |
I looked at that one too. Too many names not right. thank you anyway. |
|||
|
Maisy | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:14 |
Could these possibly be them? Sarah is a widow in 1901. |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:13 |
My grandmother gave me the names. They would be her aunts and uncles. |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:12 |
Yes Reg. That was what I thought. That still leaves 5 siblings together. It's giving me a big headache. Are the census records complete? Would it be worth going to Hove library to look? |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:11 |
You must have them somewhere to give the names and dates/places? Can you tell us exactly what you have got please? |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:11 |
He died in about 1911. Not too sure of his occupation. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:10 |
If this is Josephine's birth, she was indeed born after the census date |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:10 |
That's just it. I haven't been able to find them at all. I've tried putting in John first and then Sarah but can't find them!! |
|||
|
Krystyna♥ | Report | 16 Nov 2007 12:09 |
Yes you are correct. First two born in Brighton and the rest born in Hove. The mother Sarah A Martin was born in Rottingdean Brighton if that helps anyone. Sorry, I should have put that on in the first place!!! Thank you anyway Reg |