Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
could anyone do a 1891 + 1901 look-up please?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 27 Aug 2007 13:00 |
Adam's son james was an apprentice upholsterer in 1891, but in 1900 at his time of marriage he was an assylum attendant at Brookewood assylum woking. i beleive adam was in the r.artillary living at the barracks when he married in 1872. i cannot find him on any census' until 81. are people living in army barracks on census records or would i have to search for his army record to find when he joined army and so find when he came to britain from Ireland? |
|||
|
MarleneB | Report | 27 Aug 2007 13:17 |
If they are living in barracks then they would appear on the census but not if they were overseas |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 27 Aug 2007 13:22 |
right ok. well i could'nt find him on any census'. do you know of any websites or such that might give me information about the royal artillary or where they were at that time? |
|||
|
Bryan HOGGARTH | Report | 27 Aug 2007 13:24 |
This is not the right given name but I'll bet it is your man since eh did get married in exeter shortly afterwards to jane Underhill. |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 27 Aug 2007 13:31 |
he was born in newry, i think. however he would be 10 years older, although it could have been wrongly transcribed. if he was 34 it could tie in. his age on marriage cert is 36. however why would his name be timothy on this???? |
|||
|
Bryan HOGGARTH | Report | 27 Aug 2007 13:34 |
And just to add to the confusion in 1861 he was called Patrick. (maybe he was nicknamed Paddy and the man writing out the census assumed that was a version of Patrick). Many people in the services were known by nicknames. |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 27 Aug 2007 13:37 |
thnks bryan. i guess if he was irish, that would be the most obvious nickname!!! |
|||
|
Bryan HOGGARTH | Report | 27 Aug 2007 14:05 |
I know little about military records. Try doing an internet search or try starting a thread asking for help with Royal Artillery records. |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 27 Aug 2007 15:21 |
ok well thank you sooooo much for your help. i can't beleive how much more i know now than i did this morning. he would have only been 14 in 1851 so too young to be on there in the army. will start another thread about r.atiliary. thanks again bryan. |