Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Mike. The Leicester Lad.(GC)
|
Report
|
27 Aug 2007 22:28 |
Greeting’s again Jackie
Details from 1851. Census returns HO 107 / 2090. / 425. / Page. 29. Leicester. St. Mary’s Parish.
Gray Street.
WILLIAM BRANSTON Head M 36 M Labourer Lei FLECKNEY ELIZABETH BRANSTON Wife M 40 F Factory Work Lei Leicester ANN BRANSTON Dau 6 F Scholar Lei Leicester WILLIAM BRANSTON Son 4 M Lei Leicester ELIZABETH BRANSTON Dau 7days F Lei Leicester
MIKE.
|
|
John
|
Report
|
1 Sep 2007 15:42 |
Mike Require your help again please. I have death certificate for JOSEPH TOMKINS son of 'HENRY' TOMKINS 199 Birstall St, Joseph lived for 3 days only and was buried 30th May 1883. My query is, the census for 1881/1891 show occupant of 199 Birstall St as GEORGE HENRY TOMKINS and in 1883 had a daughter GERTRUDE could Joseph have been a son of GEORGE HENRY and a possible twin to GERTRUDE?. GEORGE HENRY later lost two other infants buried in plot T891 at Welford Rd but JOSEPH buried in plot S2908. Unless you can see the obvious answer, could you please check parish records for birth parents of JOSEPH?. Regards Jon O'Kent
|
|
Mike. The Leicester Lad.(GC)
|
Report
|
1 Sep 2007 20:18 |
***F.A.O.*** Linda
Greeting’s again Linda.
I don’t want you to think I had forgotten your latest query Thomas, Father to Ann Bond who married Thomas Gent.
I did recheck the Parish Registers again this week And sort the second opinion of someone from the Records Office As to the surname of Ann’s Father on the Marriage Registers.
They seem to think it is NOT Jaques but could well be Joynes. The tail of the Y was going the other way which made me think it was a Q Or could be Joines or Joiners. Difficult when your looking at hand writing and Signatures At the moment I’m trawling through the Census returns using the New surnames...... . Depending on the results I find. I then will check out Parish Baptisms at the Records Office and report back on this thread.
MIKE.
|
|
Marcie
|
Report
|
1 Sep 2007 20:51 |
hi i,m looking for mary simmons c1764 of shawell who married phillip hewitt c 1760-1819 of shawell. Also alexander edwards born 22/06/1900, i believe he died young in motercycle crash. Also looking for a marriage between william astill c1757 & sarah c 1767 of shawell, have looked everywhere i can think of for further info on these people marcie x
|
|
Linda
|
Report
|
1 Sep 2007 22:52 |
Hi Mike
Thanks again Linda
|
|
Mike. The Leicester Lad.(GC)
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 00:19 |
Greeting’s & Welcome……… Marcie
Confirmation of Marriage :~
Phillip Hewitt. Mary Simmons. 23rd. October. 1787. All Saints Parish Church. Shawell, Leicestershire By Banns. Wit’s :~ James Sedge. John Ward.
Baptisms of Siblings to Mary. With Parents Edward & Mary Simmons. All Saints Shawell. William. 15th. Aug. 1762. Mary. 8th. Mar. 1764. Edward. 1st. April.1765 Sarah. 22nd.Nov. 1767. Nathaniel. 18th.May. 1773. Buried 17th. Nov. 1773. Lydia. 7th. May. 1775. Nathaniel. 13th. Oct. 1777.
Plus this one :~ Edward. ( Baseborn child. ? ) 1st.Apr. 1777.Father :~ Edward Simmons.
Simmons Burials found :~
All Saints Parish Church. Shawell, Leicestershire.
Edward Simmons 26th. Feb. 1803. Died in consequences of drinking too much Spirits.
Edward Simmons. 26th. March.1804. Hung Himself Verdict :~ Lunacy.
I could only find a ref to an Alexander Edwards c 1900 Jul. ~ Aug. ~ Sept. Qrt. 1900. Cert. No. 7a. 295.
1901. Census returns RG 13. / 2989. / 165. / Page. Leicester. Christchurch Parish. Formally St. Margaret’s Parish.
No. 30. Alfred Terrace. Agnes Edward. Head Mar. 26. b Scotland. David. Son. 4. b Ireland. Alexander. 11 Months Old. b Leicester.
Sorry could not see anything for William Astill & Sarah. ?
Hope this is of some help.
MIKE.
|
|
Mike. The Leicester Lad.(GC)
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 18:12 |
Welcome Back ….Tracey
I need the last piece of the equation in order to pin point the right people
Can you state the years of birth of both the Mary Alice Wright’s. Plus…… If possible the place of birth for both of them . ?
Or can you state the Ref No’s for the 1901. censuses returns you have found them on.
Thanks in anticipation.
MIKE. xx
|
|
English Bob
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 18:29 |
Hello Mike, I am still monitoring your threads, just in case I spot one of your customers that may have a link for my Cooke’s. I believe I can comment that you seem to have increased your stock of research CD’s.
So nearly two years on I’m going to beg of you to take another look for the infamous Thomas Cooke, yes the one who states he was born Loughborough 1824 in three census 1851,61,71. I still haven’t been able to find this birth in PR’s.
You may remember that I have him married to Eleanor Stoppard in 1846 and his father was a Thomas also and is given as a Coachman on the marriage certificate. I have everything going forward, much of which was your help, but can’t get back without a birth for him or a marriage for his father. The Loughborough connection is my only lead.
I did spend a year tracing a Thomas Cooke born Rempstone to a Thomas, an innkeeper. PR’s certs the whole shebang! But this family turned out to be a parallel life....damn.
Please no panic and don’t batter your brains but for a re-appraisal look I would be grateful success or not.
Best ever regards, keep up the good work, I’ll keep reading.
Bob in Pompey .
P.S My tree is now on tribalpages, if you think it useful I can PM you the user name & password, you may even be impressed!
|
|
Mike. The Leicester Lad.(GC)
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 18:30 |
*** F.A.O.*** Jon O’ Kent.
I will try and find Baptism details for your Joseph But have a feeling that due to Joseph being only three days old. When buried I doubt if there was time to Baptise him. Taking in to account that those dates covered the Whitsun Holiday time. It would have to be a Private Baptism by either the Priest or Midwife. Which just might be in the Registers.
This would explain why Joseph was buried in Non consecrated ground. ( Not being Baptised )
Along with 40 other Still born or had not reached one year old. Including a still born with the same surname as my self.
But I will try to find Joseph…… Have you tried ordering Joseph's birth cert. Apr. May. Jun Qrt. 1883 Leicester. 7a. 240.
MIKE.
|
|
John
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 18:48 |
Mike Many thanks for your detailed comments, had not considered the baptism and burial details, will bear that in mind for the future, Regards Will send off for certificate. Jon O'Kent
|
|
Tracey
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 19:54 |
Hi Mike
The mother was born in Bridgham, Norfolk in 1853 and the daughter Fring in Norfolk in 1878.
Thank you Tracey
|
|
Tracey
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 19:55 |
Mike, just noticed you have put Mary Alice when it should be Alice Mary, lol !!
Mothers ref. is RG13, 3001, 136, pg 7, sch 7
Dau ref is RG13, 3006. 152, pg 12 sch 77
I hope that is the ref. you mean?
Thanks Mike
|
|
Mike. The Leicester Lad.(GC)
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 21:12 |
Greeting’s Again Tracey……..
Whoops …tis me age you know …lol :0))))
Re Alice M. Aged 22. niece
Now can you confirm that it is NORFOLK Index as it down as Hampshire Image as it Norfolk crossed out and Herts added …..????
“ 15 All “ …….lol
MIKE.xx
I had found Alice Snr in the Workhouse was struggling on her Daughter !!!
|
|
Marcie
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 21:27 |
hi mike many thanks for the info, i did manage to visit shawell (blow me the church was shut) many moons ago, found 3 three simmons buried in a row, stood on one grave to take a photo of the others, unforunately rabits had burrowed underneath, i went down to my knees, puts a whole new meaning on meet the ancestors, appreciate your help, & if you find any sarah's born in shawell c1767, i,d appreciate it regard marcie x
|
|
Tracey
|
Report
|
2 Sep 2007 23:00 |
Hi Mike
I know it says Hants but it is definitely Norfolk, I have been to the village and seen family graves etc.. I was hoping a burial might show up in Leicester but I suppose they could have gone back to Norfolk, having said that there must have been a fall-out otherwise why is mum in the workhouse and not living with daughter and her uncle??
Any help much appreciated
Tracey x
|
|
Mike. The Leicester Lad.(GC)
|
Report
|
3 Sep 2007 01:17 |
Greeting’s Again Tracey……
No Alice Wright Burials in Welford Road up to 1950……… Will check out other Parishes around at the time.
Shame You did not ask last week I had the original Workhouse Admission & Discharge Book 1901 onwards But can always reorder it out again at the Records Office This might give us some clues as too her condition on admission. And why she left the Workhouse. I see Alice maiden name was RIVETT I have traced both Families back till 1861.
Seems the rot might have set in 1871 ~ 81. when William took over the Farm in Fring. Plus why was Charles a retired Farmer aged just 36 in 1891. ?
Time to blow out the candle me thinks ...<3 II ~
MIKE.xx
|
|
Tracey
|
Report
|
3 Sep 2007 08:53 |
HI Mike
Thanks for looking for me. Alices's maiden name was Houchen not Rivett, where did you get that from?
I have checked the workhouse records and found where she went in and came out which was voluntarily, there wasn't any more info. than that.
The Wright family (Alice's husband and Charles ) were successful farmers but farming in Norfolk went pearshaped around the 1880's so they must have moved to Rutland and then Leicester to find work.
The problem is her name, it is so common!!
I'll try and get into town to check the Gilroes registers next unless you have them?
Failing that I wonder if the mum went back to family in Norfolk.
Best Wishes Mike Tracey x
|
|
Mike. The Leicester Lad.(GC)
|
Report
|
3 Sep 2007 15:00 |
Greeting’s Again…….. Tracey.
I was basing my choice of Partner for William James Wright On. .. As I understood it that by 1874. They were grouping couples together when there was more than two couples on a page instead of just stating those having the same Ref. No. December Qrt. 1874. Guiltcross District Cert No. 4b. 661.
I have since rechecked Bridgham Census returns 61.71.
And yes both Families of Revitt & Houchen appear.
So. …. I think the only way to determine the right partner is to order the Marriage Certificate in the name of William James Wright ONLY. Unless you have already done this.?
Yes Gilroes could be a choice for a burial / cremation of Alice. Sorry but the Council are the only people who have details for Gilroes.
But I feel you need to do a bit of homework first. The latest info I have of searches at City Council Cemetery Office. Are they are charging £5.00 per person per hour to do the search yourself Or £20.00. Per person, per hour. If they do the search for you.
MIKE. xx
|
|
Tracey
|
Report
|
3 Sep 2007 16:02 |
Hi Mike
Thanks for the info. It was definitely Houchen so will have to plod on.
I can't believe the council are charging now to look at the Gilroes books, I've looked at them in the past for nothing!!
Tracey x
|
|
Mike. The Leicester Lad.(GC)
|
Report
|
3 Sep 2007 23:44 |
Greeting’s & Welcome……Caroline.
I take it it’s the Belton on the West side of the County near to Shepshed ? Not the other one on the boarders of Leicestershire/ Rutland.
Looks like Father Charles could have died before the 1841. Census
Hall Burials for Belton.
HALL Charles 29 Jun 1838 Aged.40
Noted this interesting one which might give you a clue of the Wife for Charles
HALL Geo 16 Sept. 1837 Aged.2 Son Of Charles & Mary
1841. Census Returns :~
HO107 / 594./ Bk. 13./ Fol. 17./ Page. 10. Belton. Long Street. Mary Hall. 45. Edward Ditto. 20. Ag Lab. John. Ditto.15. Frame Work Knitter. Charles. 15. Hannah. 8. Mary. 2. All Born in the County.
And could it be that William is staying with Grandparents :~
HO 107./ 594./ Bk.13./ Fol. 5./ Page. 3. Belton. Forrest-Gate. Edward. Hall. 65.Frame Work Knitter. Mary. 60. William. 35. Ditto. George. 25. Ditto. WILLIAM. 11. All Born within the County.
Going on the fact Charles has died. Could it be that Charles‘s brother Edward. Is within the household of Mary And William Jnr. Is with Grand parents ?
Do not forget that on this Census the ages of those over 15 were rounded DOWN to the nearest multiple of Five. Hence you get two Sons aged 15.
But I will have a look at Parish Registers for you this week and get back to you on this thread
Marriages Found :~ St. John the Baptist Parish Church. Belton.
Edward Hall. ~ Mary Hall. 26th. December.1794. By Banns.
Charles Hall. ~ Mary WHITE. 17th. June. 1816. By Banns.
MIKE. xx
Seems like Caroline's post as gone walkies ? .....
|