Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Relationship to Head of House - 'Servant'
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Martin | Report | 1 Jun 2003 21:50 |
|
Is that on the original page or a transcription of it? Even the original pages have been rewritten from the census forms so you got plenty of obvious mistakes. It sounds as if someone has got made a mistake transcribing. Martin |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Belinda | Report | 1 Jun 2003 21:45 |
|
I am a newbie and wondered if it was common for the sons of a 1901 family all to be listed as 'servant'(even one 7 months old?), when the daughters were listed as daughters? |
|||