any ideas on this?

Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: August 2003 Posts: 98 Send Message	Loz From Leices	Report	14 Sep 2003 02:19
Member Since: August 2003 Posts: 98 Send Message	Hi Linda Thought i'd try again and got connected this time. Thanks for the tip I'll give it a look. It always made me wonder what if the person who registered the birth came back and told you that they'd decided to call the baby something else because you'd annoyed them for some reason. Doesn't bear thinking about really. Have had a look at this site and found it very interesting it also answered my question. Thanks for the info Lorraine
Member Since: August 2003 Posts: 98 Send Message	Loz From Leices	Report	12 Sep 2003 23:46
Member Since: August 2003 Posts: 98 Send Message	Thanks Linda I just wondered if it was legal to do that, I wonder what the position would be today. Lorraine
Member Since: August 2003 Posts: 98 Send Message	Loz From Leices	Report	12 Sep 2003 22:50
Member Since: August 2003 Posts: 98 Send Message	My gt gt grandfather John Reddell was born 1858, his father's name John Reddell is on the birth certificate. John Reddell snr was married to an Elizabeth Ludlaw she is named as mother, but the informant of the birth is an Elizabeth Woodcock described as Occupier. Was it usual for someone other than the parents to register the birth. I know John snr survived for a number of years after the birth but I'm not sure about the mother.