Genealogy Chat

SORRY TED !! THANXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Glad your pleased, hope they are yours. BUT why only one little kiss? I always send you two big ones. LOL TED XX

HAS to be them Ted Thank you SSooo much - I will follow them all up + send for some certs. Dea x

Dea, SUSSANAH born BOLTON 1846, JUNE Book 21 page 230. SARAH born 1847 JUNE book 21 page 157, BOLTON. THOMAS born JUNE 1853, BOLTON 8C 313. All worth looking at, except no PENDLETON. TED XX

Dea, MARTHA GREENHALGH born BOLTON 1843 book 21 page 111. Worth a try seeing as mom and dad were married BOLTON year earlier. What do you think.

Thank you Merry - Great minds think alike - I've had a trawl for the death but haven't found it yet. BUT I WILL !!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks again, Dea x

I don't wish to appear negative, but re Martha, I think Ted was just reminding you when the first child was born as if to re-establish that the marriage would be good for date :O(( But I expect it is the right one!! Maybe you could trawl for Lucy's death to confirm? Merry

TED< TED< TED !!! I know I gave you Martha's name BUT you have confirmed it as their first child. !!! - HOW GREAT IS THAT ??? Seriously, Thank you for the info - I have found the wedding now on 1837 BUT If you can remember where you confirmed Martha's birth, please let me know - If not, - hey ho!! - I'll find it again another way, one day! Dea x

Dea. youre making me blush now. Found it a site, cant remember now, it was half an hour ago and you dont expect my brain to keep up with time do you. Martha, you gave the name on your first post. TED.XX

TED - YOU LOVELY MAN !!! Where did you find that marriage???????????? and how do you know 1st child was Martha??????? Dea x

Thanks Ted, But, he should be a joiner and he SHOULD have 3 daughters - Martha 8, Susannah 6, and Sarah A 4. Can't be him???????????? Dea x

Dea. marriage THOMAS GREENHALGH to LUCY TURNER 1842 BOLTON VOL 21 PAGE 37. is that any good to you. First child MARTHA born 1843.

Dea, hi again. No, that THOMAS GREENHALGH was born in PENDLETON not BURY. he was lodging there age 27 which would have made his birth year 1824. TED. not a joiner though, down as a coal miner.

Ted, It COULD be him but I think he got married in either 1842 0r 1845 and he SHOULD be a Joiner, not a Coal miner. Dea x

Merry + Joan, Pendleton is Salford, Manchester, Lancashire. Thanks for looking, Dea.x

Dea, is Pendleton the one near Pendle Hill, near Sabden, near Clitheroe ? Or somewhere else. Not sure where I am looking now. Joan (with a rubber on her pencil)

Just because the mother-in-law is called Turner doesn't mean that was her daughters name when she married Thomas. Mother or daughter could have been married more than once! You need a child's birth cert!! Only trouble is, I can't see any that fit on FreeBMD. So would mean a search of the GRO indexes. It is Clitheroe District, isn't it? Merry

Ted, You are confusing me now. - I do't know Catherines husband's first name as she was a widdow in 1861. Yes, I believe she must have a daughter who was married to Thomas Greenhalgh. The Thomas you have in 1861 is not the right one - my one was born Pendleton (not Bury) and was a Joiner (not a Coal miner). Thanks for the help though. Dea x

Dea THOMAS GREENHALGH 1851 HO 107/2215 age 27 born Pendleton, coal miner living in BURY.

Dea, the way I see it is this, could be wrong. CATHERINE TURNER must have married a TURNER, how do you know his first name as she is a widow 73 in 1861. So THOMAS GREENHALGH must have married one of CATHERINES daughters and THOMAS son in law was a widower in 1861. Am I right so far? TED