Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Ancestry, I Found me I do exist told you so !!!!

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Kim from Sandhurst

Kim from Sandhurst Report 20 Jan 2006 17:41

Lynn I think you are quite lucky at least it was near. Been looking on 1891 for 2 days now for Bowyer, one has been mistranscribed as Carter, I could understand it if the one above was that name but it was Gates, and the other was King the family name from the top of the page!!! Now got to do a rethink on the rest of my brick walls! Kim

lyndy

lyndy Report 20 Jan 2006 15:42

howsthis for a laugh my lot havebeen totally mucked up in the 1851 cencustheygot my anncesters down as lezze instead of legge so i give up from lyndy

Christine in Herts

Christine in Herts Report 20 Jan 2006 13:06

You can sometimes get round it by going into an image you don't want and then using the links at the top of that page to get to what you do want - assuming the page you want has been put into the correct alpha section! Christine

Jean

Jean Report 20 Jan 2006 11:06

Lunar the same thing happened with me. Looking for a Smith and was given a page starting with Mc and finishing with X. as with you it was an addition. The name before the X was also a Mc! So unable to find that one. Is there any point in mailing them about this?

Kate

Kate Report 20 Jan 2006 10:42

I suspect they used OCR software to do the indexes to the typed pages, and that could explain some of the 'mistranscriptions', though they would have had to use real people to do the handwritten ones. Kate.

Christine in Herts

Christine in Herts Report 20 Jan 2006 10:30

Just realised why there might be pages apparently (but prob not actually) missing. Have just reported Thomas F C'connor - Ronald A Ogborne for faulty index - on a page headed O'CO-OGB. It is in the section for names beginning with C Christine

Christine in Herts

Christine in Herts Report 20 Jan 2006 10:09

I lost count of how many ''Faulty index'' submissions I made (using the ''wrong image'' reporting option). I found out this morning when I looked at my e-mail: 15 - fifteen! (And I didn't bother checking all of the ones I saw as likely errors.) Actually there were two or three Missing-image reports amongst that lot. What is as daft as using the out-of-sequence names as the End-value is ignoring the page-headers which tell you the first three letters of the first and last names. Really basic. Christine

Sarah

Sarah Report 20 Jan 2006 09:03

Well done for finding yourselves! I thought I'd test yesterday and found that although I know my place & dates of birth, I am, actually, a figment of my own imagination..... ....or maybe they just haven't done 1964 yet.... Spellings - I started a thread on this... they must have been real dozos when they transcribed.

Bobtanian

Bobtanian Report 20 Jan 2006 08:49

I just cannot believe............the amount of mis-spelt names in the indexes......'M's instead of 'H's.............I have a french origin surname..........and is often spelt pronounced wrongly......but on one of the pages, (original) a 'x' is typed as ''z'' Bob

Angela

Angela Report 20 Jan 2006 08:06

Yippee - I exist too. Well ..... the way I feel this morning I needed someone to confirm it!

Borobabs

Borobabs Report 20 Jan 2006 00:48

Also fom May 1951;;; I do not exist ignore this message;;;;;;; Babs ps I've never been married as well;;;;;;; well only twice;;;

Pete

Pete Report 20 Jan 2006 00:31

Valerie,, I thought you knew me!!

Helen

Helen Report 20 Jan 2006 00:29

thank you i thought that , like i said brain must be in another planet Helen

Val wish I'd never started

Val wish I'd never started Report 20 Jan 2006 00:29

so they didnt have you first then Pete ??? yes there are a lot of mistranscriptions I know , but it will get better

McAlp

McAlp Report 20 Jan 2006 00:27

Lucky you, the 2nd 1/4 for 1945 is still missing!!!!!! And just for the record. I was born June 1945 only 2 -1/4's after my parents married are they trying to hide this from me? Too late i have my birth certificate . Ann

Pete

Pete Report 20 Jan 2006 00:26

if you want to locate a name in the register it was the name you had at the start of he day. For births and marriages maiden name Deaths married name. ( you won't be looking for your death!) (yes there are some odd second marriage exceptions but...)

Helen

Helen Report 20 Jan 2006 00:18

can i ask a qestion? did you ladies put you married name in or your name, my brain not working, or its in overdrive Helen

Rachel

Rachel Report 19 Jan 2006 23:59

I've just found me on a mistranscribed page - they've only gone and taken the very last name listed as the end of the page range and it was a later addition/correction!!! twitts - thay must have had apes doing the work! Pete I'm registered 12 quarters after my parents marriage (and I'm the first born)

Pete

Pete Report 19 Jan 2006 23:56

And you think you had a result! I found my birth registered five quarters after my parents marriage. So contrary to popular belief ......

Val wish I'd never started

Val wish I'd never started Report 19 Jan 2006 23:50

hurray I thought I did exist and now I know I do finally found me on Ancestry, its easy when you know how .