Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Eyes plus Inspiration
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MickT | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:15 |
|
Could someone with better sight than I have atm. pleasecheck a census image for me. See below. Mick |
|||
|
MickT | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:19 |
|
1851 census Surrey. Lambeth Lambeth Church First. District 10 Page 24 52 High Street. TiA. mick |
|||
|
Jeanette | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:24 |
|
also need the Piece number H0107/ ???? and folio number as well as page 24 jeanette |
|||
|
Sarah | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:24 |
|
What's the name? well a rough idea... I can't get the image without it. - There's probably a way but I don't know it. Sarah |
|||
|
MickT | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:26 |
|
The first name should be William Turley head 63 next Mary wife 58 I can't make out the rest. Mick |
|||
|
MickT | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:29 |
|
Sorry about that. HO 107 1571 Mick |
|||
|
Fiona | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:29 |
|
This family 1851. James V Turley abt 1838 Lambeth, Surrey, England Son Lambeth Surrey View Record Sarah Turley abt 1812 Bermondsey Wife Lambeth Surrey View Record Sarah Turley abt 1840 Lambeth, Surrey, England Daughter Lambeth Surrey View Record Wm Turley abt 1811 St Giles, Middlesex, England Head Lambeth Surrey Address looks like......William St. William is a Paper Hanger? |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:31 |
|
Hi, its just as it says on the transcript, Mary Ann Mary |
|||
|
Zoe | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:31 |
|
You mean these guys Jane Toney abt 1827 Lambeth, Surrey, England Son Lambeth Surrey Mary Toney abt 1793 ?? Wife Lambeth Surrey Willm Toney abt 1788 ?? Head Lambeth Surrey Can't get to image keeps saying error Zoe |
|||
|
MickT | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:31 |
|
No. They turn up in every census, but I can't establish a relationship Mick |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:33 |
|
I just looked at the census page and can only see the three names Zoe posted.......except Jane should be James....... Merry |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:36 |
|
Im seeing a different image to you lot! I have William born 1800 then Mary Ann then Mary. Am I going mad or what? Are you talking about the next family Lavina and co? Sorry, cant get into ancestry to double check. Cant print it yet Mick, as Im getting internal server error on ancestry. |
|||
|
MickT | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:38 |
|
Hi Zoe That looks about right. The name is Turley. Occ. should read Pastry Cook. The son has me beaten Mick |
|||
|
Sarah | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:47 |
|
Hi Mick, Want to help but I've just looked through 750 records trying to find him. You have already found him on ancestrry I imagine - Have you got a few more details - How did you find him? Could you find him again? Please give me a few more clues how to get this image on my screen... Sarah :-) UPDATE - INTHE TIME IT TOOK ME TO WRITE THAT EVERYONE FOUND HIM.... Well done! :-) |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:48 |
|
Hi, Mick added the page etc after you and I must have started searching, I was going on the name. But Zoe seems cleverly to have found the family for him. Ancestry disappeared in the middle of me looking at the image and since then Ive had server error. WHEN I get back on there Mick, Ill send the lot I found to you if you want as surely they must be related? Ancestry home page has now changed but I still get technical error coming up. |
|||
|
MickT | Report | 24 Jan 2006 20:54 |
|
Yes. Zoe has found the right ones. The image is abysmally faint. Is it possible to enhance it in any way to make it legible. Mick |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 24 Jan 2006 21:02 |
|
Having saved the image and fiddled about with the brightness and contrast it might say Warehouseman!! But then again........LOL Merry |
|||
|
Sarah | Report | 24 Jan 2006 21:04 |
|
Hi Mick, Eventually found it thanks to the folio number. Had a look anyway, Could the son be Laurie? or Laurence, it looks like he has a second name too. I'm not convinced that the first letter is a J though if it is then James seems possible - but then again - I'm a beginner in all this... ho hum... Sarah Looked on 1861 - There's a James born abt1826 in Lambeth, so I guess it probably was James |
|||
|
MickT | Report | 24 Jan 2006 23:12 |
|
Thanks to all for your help. Mick |
|||