Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Baugh Family - Any Ideas???

Page 0 + 1 of 3

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 20:21

This is getting spooky now Helen - we have to be related! Thank you again for this. A few more to add to the tree. Jayne x

Helen

Helen Report 4 Mar 2006 20:04

1851 Holywell Lane, Dawley George Bailey 46 Ann Bailey 48 George Bailey 21 William Bailey 19 Robert Bailey 16 Ann Bailey 13 Michael Bailey 11

Helen

Helen Report 4 Mar 2006 19:52

Annie Elizabeth in 1861 George Bailey 58 Head labouer born Dawley Ann Bailey 60 wife Bridgnorth Michael Bailey 20 son Dawley Isaac Haywood 25 son-in-law Dawley Ann Haywood 23 dau Dawley ANN E 2 g-dau Dawley Jane E 14 days g-dau Dawley Address is Dawley Green Lane P.S. I have Baileys and Haywoods in my tree too!

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 19:48

OK I'm going to go for it. If it is the same one it means the info that Nell found for me is the wrong family as the parents are listed as Beriah and Sarah. That will be such a shame as it all looked so promising! Thank you all so very much for your help. It really is greatly appreciated. Jayne x

MrsBucketBouquet

MrsBucketBouquet Report 4 Mar 2006 19:43

Jayn I just looked at 1837 again and I think thats the one that I sent you!..they hardly ever reg. birth in the same month. Theres no William on the one before...I looked.

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 19:39

And the other thing is the spelling - sometimes its Beriah and others Briah! Why did I ever start this??? Jayne x

Helen

Helen Report 4 Mar 2006 19:37

There's a slight problem when you look at the 1851 and search on Beriah Baugh. Only 3 come up but........ Beriah Baugh abt 1827 Dawley, Shropshire, England Son-in-law Dawley Shropshire Beriah Baugh abt 1831 Dawley, Shropshire, England Son Dawley Shropshire Beriah Baugh abt 1831 Dawley, Shropshire, England Son Dawley Shropshire Give or take a year or two (and they nearly always did) any of these could be you ancestor!

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 19:36

Just been on Family Search and they have a William Baugh born 3rd March 1860, Dark Lane, Dawley, Shropshire - parents Beriah and Sarah. I need his birth certificate badly! Jayne x

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 19:32

Thank you Helen. Can you tell me how I do that? Sorry I told you I wasn't very good at this! I'll let you know if I find a connection. Jayne x

Helen

Helen Report 4 Mar 2006 19:30

I've done lots of research on ancestors from Dawley area. As soon as I saw the name Baugh in the title of your thread I guessed there could be a Dawley connection. My tip is, go with the IGI Parish Records for the area. I've found them really good and accurate when checked to the originals. A Jane Baugh c1765 is my 5G Gran so you never know, we may be related!

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 19:25

Hi Helen, Thank you for the information but I think it would make my Beriah too young to be this one. I'll keep the info though just in case my date of birth for William turns out to be wrong! Thanks again Jayne x

Helen

Helen Report 4 Mar 2006 19:23

BERIAH BAUGH Marriages: Spouse: MARY ANN DARBY Marriage: 15 JAN 1843 Halesowen, Worcester, England Husband Age at Marriage: 20 Wife Age at Marriage: 17 IGI Batch No M013761

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 19:18

Sent it to you Gerri - thank you. Jayne x

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 19:16

I'm not very good at this stuff to start with now I'm totally confused! Does this mean the one on FreeBMD is wrong? What about the one on Beta (6a 536)???? Now there's Geri's 2. HELP!!!! Jayne x

MrsBucketBouquet

MrsBucketBouquet Report 4 Mar 2006 19:16

Jayne if you want the image from 1837...PM me your addy.. Gerri.

MrsBucketBouquet

MrsBucketBouquet Report 4 Mar 2006 19:13

Sorry to butt in here and pleased that you have got this far but..... I thought I'd check on 1837 for you the birth ref for William 1860 June madeley... 6d 568 and yet right next to that is another Madeley birth and it's 6a!!!! I dont get it! They are both very clear!

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 19:09

OK I have a problem. When I put the quarter in as June it says there are no matches but there is an entry for December 'William Henry Baugh' 6a 536. I can see the one on FreeBMD but not on Beta. Am I going mad? Jayne x

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 19:02

I've just put the details in and it's coming up as no entries! I'll try again. Jayne

Thelma

Thelma Report 4 Mar 2006 18:56

You must look at image On large it is almost certain 563

Jayne

Jayne Report 4 Mar 2006 18:52

Thanks Jim I'm going to order the cert. Keep your fingers crossed Jayne x