Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
On every census but no birth reference??
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
The Ego | Report | 24 May 2006 18:26 |
Ann or Annie Tudsbury was 9 in 1861,19 in 1871,29 in 1881,39 in 1891,49 in 1901....stayed with her siblings all her life,in the same village of Edwinstowe Notts ,and died there in the 1930's,never married.In every census it states that she was born in Cawthorne Yorkshire-evry other child and all the other generations were born in the village,and a previous child born 1848 died in 1853,so she might have been at a hospital or something..........she should be born 1851/2..........but i cant for the life of me find her birth ref or christening-evry other one has been found...........?????????? |
|||
|
The Ego | Report | 24 May 2006 18:28 |
So to summarise Anne or Annie or Anne E. Tudsbury born 1851 or 1852 or even any female Tudsbury born then ? |
|||
|
Anne | Report | 24 May 2006 18:29 |
So when did the family move to Edwinstowe if they were all born in Cawthorne? Anne |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 24 May 2006 18:34 |
Perhaps she went home to mum for the birth or were her parents from the village too? Heather |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 24 May 2006 18:36 |
Shouldn't her birth be 1841/2 rather than 1851/2 ? Kath. x |
|||
|
The Ego | Report | 24 May 2006 18:37 |
They didnt move to edwinstowe the family had been there for over 200 years -lots of generations-all the kids befor and afterr were born in the village-uncles,aunts,grandparents etc.Ann's parents got married in the mothers village,but the father and past generations were all edwinstowe born and bred. I think there must be sheets missing- reason being that there are no Tudsbury births at all listed in 1852 and 1851.....in the whole of the country,just a few deaths. |
|||
|
The Ego | Report | 24 May 2006 18:39 |
no ive cocked up the title info....she was born 1852 or 1851...ill change it. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 24 May 2006 18:41 |
Were the other children's births registered? Registration wasn't compulsory then, so she may not have been registered. Kath. x |
|||
|
The Ego | Report | 24 May 2006 18:44 |
Father,2 older brothers,younger 2 brother,grandfather,grandmother and previous 5 generations all edwinstowe. Previous sibling mary died aged about 5 in 1853. Her mother is from Derby. Not bothered if she was born out of county,but just that her birth doesnt seem to show on official records at all- perhaps there are missing sheets. |
|||
|
The Ego | Report | 24 May 2006 18:45 |
Yes all registered,all christened etc etc.... |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 24 May 2006 18:45 |
So I can see her mum and dad with older siblings in Edwinstone on the 1851 shortly before Ann was born.....so we just need to ask them why mum popped off to Yorkshire for the birth....... Very odd isn't it? Merry |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 24 May 2006 18:50 |
So.....who is this? 1852 Q3 Nottingham District 7a 178 - Ann Eliza TUDBURY The page and volume number need checking (shouldn't it be 7b?). If it's her, it's still VERY odd?!! Merry |
|||
|
The Ego | Report | 24 May 2006 18:59 |
Correction..........this is odd..........the area in notts is very good for records,and there is an oddity here. Richard John Tudsbury1840 eldest=has a birth reg and christening William Tudsbury 1843 2nd born =NO birth reg christening yes Mary Tudsbury 1848= birth reg christening yes AnnieTudsbury 1852=NObirth reg nothing Frederick 1854= NO birth reg christening yes Walter Albert 1858= NO birth reg christening yes |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 24 May 2006 19:00 |
Alter....do you know whose birth reg that is that I posted? (suspense is killing!) Merry |
|||
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers | Report | 24 May 2006 19:02 |
The 7a district is a bit of a funny one,it is really Lincolnshire,but encroaches into parts of Nottinghamshire as well. For instance Collingham is half way between Lincoln and Newark,but a lot of the births were registered in the Lincoln district,as oppossed to the Nottinghamshire (Newark) district.It can also cover Retford births,i think it depends where the informant headed for the market that day!!! Neither Retford or Newark are that far from Edwinstowe,but a bit of a trek back then. Glen |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 24 May 2006 19:02 |
Aaaggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I have died............................................... Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp M.......e...............r............................r................................y |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 24 May 2006 19:04 |
Registration didn't become compulsory until 1875.......the birth may simply not have been registered. Reg |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 24 May 2006 19:08 |
I have resuscitated myself (as no one here cares!) ALTER. Who does that birth reg belong to? Answer me!!!!!!! (I shall buy the cert in a minute!!) Glen....Not sure what you mean about 7a and 7b?? Surely Nottingham district is 7b? Merry |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 24 May 2006 19:10 |
Glen .................there is a thread for you to post on, on General, by Ann Warren! Turnip or swede? Merry |
|||
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers | Report | 24 May 2006 19:21 |
Oh ok,will have a look. The 7a also covers some Leicester and Ashby de La Zouch as well,(on freebmd)pick the name Chambers,vol 7a and a ten year span say 1850-1860 and they all come up,Ashby de la Z,Lincoln,Caistor,Leicester.It's a major pain at times. The tripwire just went off,see you all tomorrow. Glen |