Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Chadwick and Robinson
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
ErikaH | Report | 20 Feb 2022 19:20 |
Well, pardon me! I don’t have intimate knowledge of the area. It was only a suggestion! |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 20 Feb 2022 18:49 |
There are too many unknowns to permit a definite answer. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 20 Feb 2022 18:26 |
Audley??? That is miles away from Staffordshire Moorlands |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 20 Feb 2022 11:33 |
?????????? |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 20 Feb 2022 11:31 |
SMITH, SARAH 77 |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 20 Feb 2022 08:55 |
Unless my research to date is completely wrong, that is unlikely as she would have been born at roughly the same time as Sarah Chadwick who I believe is Mary Chadwick’s mother. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 19 Feb 2022 18:08 |
Presumably this death? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 19 Feb 2022 18:04 |
I tried the familysearch. website. I checked the 1809 Baptism record of Mary Chadwick.. The information on that website is wrong, it lists her father as James Chadwick. The Parish record on FMP states that she is illegitimate and her reputed father is James Newbold. Does not inspire much confidence in the familysearch information! |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 19 Feb 2022 17:18 |
Thanks. The June 1782 looks the more promising being 10 months before Sarah's baptism in March 1783. I have also found a Death record of a Mary Chadwick in 1839, who may be the mother of by great-grandfather born in 1834 and explain why he was living with his uncle in 1841. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 19 Feb 2022 14:43 |
The marriages I posted are on Family Search - and so is the 1783 baptism: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 19 Feb 2022 13:28 |
FMP collect their info from church records - the one you took to be Sarah’s does not have the image, so you’d need to go to the County Records Office to see it. |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 19 Feb 2022 13:22 |
Thanks. I have not tried church records as yet. Are these available on FMP. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 19 Feb 2022 13:02 |
As I pointed out, ages in 1841 were routinely ‘rounded down’, which would make her anything from 60 to 64 |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 19 Feb 2022 12:51 |
Baptism in later childhood wasn't at all uncommon - but as ErikaH says, there's no proof she's the same person. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 19 Feb 2022 12:38 |
I posted 1841 earlier, and her age is 60................which would have been rounded down as per the instructions given to enumerators. |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 19 Feb 2022 12:27 |
Thanks for clarifying the listed information, much appreciated. I did check the marriage status of Sarah Chadwich and she did marry Moses Smith, late in life it appears. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 19 Feb 2022 12:18 |
1. She was not necessarily baptised in the same year as she was born. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 19 Feb 2022 12:05 |
No offence Peter - merely explaining why I didn't post the info. |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 19 Feb 2022 11:43 |
To clarify the data I have. In the Census data I have for my great-great-great grandmother there are the following issues : |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 19 Feb 2022 11:31 |
ErikaH |