Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
"Adoptions" from a workhouse
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 23 Mar 2019 12:31 |
Are there any surviving school records where her 'parents' are listed? |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 19 Mar 2019 08:52 |
The young lady in this case certainly seems to have been brought up as if she was a blood daughter. She is mentioned in her adoptive fathers will because she received a bequest. She had quite an unusual life as an adult, marrying in Chile in 1898, with her 2 older children born born there. The other 2 seem to have been born during trips back to England, where she clearly travelled when pregnant (that doesn't sound too appealing). The family did settle back in England, having gone backwards and forwards for about 10 years. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 18 Mar 2019 22:22 |
It could be very cruel .................. back then someone could go to the workhouse and have a child bound to him/her in service. Often that happened to very young children ......... think of chimney sweeps! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 18 Mar 2019 17:37 |
Yes, I am aware that formal adoption didn't start until 1920's. In this case the child was brought up by a couple and is described by the "father" as his adopted daughter in his will. She appears with them on the 1891 census as a '"daughter", but not in 1881. Having looked at births with the right forename in the right period, there is only one child not with the expected parents in 1891. In 1881 she is with her widowed mother and siblings, but the mother died. The youngest child is listed in the workhouse in 1891, and the other older ones are "in service".So I am fairly confident I have identified the child. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 18 Mar 2019 17:26 |
Are you sure that the child was actually "adopted" ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 18 Mar 2019 17:22 |
Well legal adoption didn't start till 1927 so any adoptions before then would be on an informal arrangement |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 18 Mar 2019 17:16 |
Does anyone know what the procedure would have been for "adopting" a child who was in a workhouse having been orphaned? Unfortunately the admissions and withdrawals for the workhouse in question for the period in question (1880's) have not survived. However, some other records have. Would the Board of Guardians have been involved , or would the Superintendent have been able to permit it? What record, if any, might have been completed? |