Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
So what happened to Daniel Smith?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 7 May 2018 22:12 |
On the other hand - |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 7 May 2018 22:00 |
Maybe he didn't like having Hook as a name?! Or maybe Henry was a mistake by the registrar. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 21:37 |
John 'Hook' Smith and John Henry Smith? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 7 May 2018 18:45 |
Just for the record: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 7 May 2018 17:16 |
The Smith/Fleming is on this link |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 May 2018 16:47 |
So, are you saying you have a copy of the cert of the Smith/Fleming marriage? |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 16:20 |
Yes ErikaH we have this on page one of this thread Daniel Smith born 1889..I suspect +++DetEcTive+++ has the correct Daniel in question. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 May 2018 15:33 |
The marriage cert would tell you his declared age, and his father's name (if known) which might help you to pinpoint him |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 15:22 |
That looks a very likely candidate in deed. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 7 May 2018 14:39 |
Ancestry is linking the 1911 census with this death |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 14:29 |
If I can pinpoint Daniel Smith it may answer a lot of questions in respects to my family research. Daniel can't just dissappear, there must be a record for him post 1915+ |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 14:26 |
ErikaH absolutely! That's what makes this the more fascinating to me :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 May 2018 14:11 |
Her 'marriage' to Nelson is of questionable legality, in view of the fact that she used her maiden name. |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 13:19 |
Can only surmise that Mary Frances Fleming assumed the name Nelson up until 1928 whereupon she used the name legally upon her marriage to Richard Henry Nelson. It begs the question theirfore was she not free to marry until 1928? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 7 May 2018 12:56 |
Would this be them on the 1939 register? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 12:19 |
Her daughter Mary came with her to Stockton. Mary Frances Fleming and Richard Henry Nelson appear to have children together certainly from about 1920. On Richard Henry Nelson's death certificate from the 1960s I see Mary Arbuckle (Smith) listed as informant step daughter. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 7 May 2018 11:27 |
Children out of wedlock is not at all unusual now, and never has been! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 10:52 |
I known Mary Frances Fleming was certainly no longer in the area by the early to mid 20's. She taken up with Richard Henry Nelson of Stockton but curiously they had children prior to marrying. That struck me as unusual for the time period.in fact they didn't marry until 1928. Why was that? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 10:48 |
1915 birth of daughter Mary shows they were both living at 36 Alexandra Road Newport. His profession listed as Dock worker. Perhaps he joined the Navy? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Laird | Report | 7 May 2018 10:45 |
Thanks guys very helpful. On the 1914 marriage license I think I got 226 Coronation Road, Cwwbran so certainly they were both of the area. |
|||
Researching: |