Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
help &Advice
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
mgnv | Report | 4 Jul 2014 21:48 |
I don't think so - there is a site which shows which pit they died in if there was an accident. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 20 Jul 2014 11:55 |
On the marriage records front, if you know where a couple were married & it was a CofE church, the county records office may have the marriage register. You should then be able to view either a microfilm copy, a scan, or the actual register. If the detail has been microfilmed, many county records offices have the facility to print from the film or scan. Whilst there is usually a charge, it is far less than buying a copy of the cert typically less than £1. If the marriage register is still held at the church concerned try contacting the church who may give you the detail. Before doing any of these its worth checking whether there is a full transcript of the marriage available on line. Whilst some records offices have gone down the route of scanning parish registers & making them available on line. I haven't found post 1837 marriages scans on line - could be some copyright issues connected to the GRO. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 20 Jul 2014 12:44 |
So you have not seen any parish registers online then Julie.....I have many of my ancestors marriages |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 20 Jul 2014 12:58 |
Following on from jax's post, Ancestry has scans of parish registers for London, Surrey, Lancashire and Dorset - wish they had been on earlier in my searches, I would have saved a lot of money not having to have bought marriage certs! |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 23 Jul 2014 20:11 |
Thanks everyone. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 23 Jul 2014 20:50 |
To those who have commented about on line scans of parish records, I did say in my earlier post that it was scan/images of marriage registers from 1837 onwards that I hadn't see on line, rather than not seeing any parish registers on line at all. Lincolnshire have scanned all burial & baptism registers they have, except the ones that have entries less than 100 years old. They have also scanned the marriages records up to & including 1836. These are all free to view on the lincstothepast.com site. (I am aware that some other counties have scans on line, but charge to view them, the lincs site only charges for copies of the scans) |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 23 Jul 2014 21:55 |
There are many Cornish parish register images (post 1837) on line at Family Search, which are free to look at. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 24 Jul 2014 03:35 |
Last time I used Seax I spent £5 for 24 hours...I managed to get 4 marriages |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 24 Jul 2014 12:54 |
In a post near the beginning of this thread, you mentioned your gr-grandfather born c1920, Elaine. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 10 Aug 2014 21:57 |
Hi, |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 30 Aug 2014 19:01 |
I am looking at a census. At the part giving details of parents it confirms Mr as the head, his wife married for 3 years and details of children. It is same info on both lines but beside Mr name there is a line through this part. What does that mean? |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 30 Aug 2014 19:36 |
It was the wife who was supposed to answer the question about how long the marriage had been for and how many children born to that marriage etc. Many people completed it wrongly against the husband's name, so it was crossed out and put in the right place by the enumerator or the husband realised it was in the wrong place. If you look at the top of the column where the numbers are entered on an original census return it says |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 30 Aug 2014 20:01 |
Widows are also not married women, but some mistakenly gave marr & births details - these are also crossed out, but thankfully, just with a single line, and so are still quite readable. |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 30 Aug 2014 21:26 |
Thank you for that. :-) |