Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Alison
|
Report
|
2 Oct 2012 19:48 |
Still not easy :-D I've found two possibilities in the 1851 census - one is Thomas and Ann Riley, farm labourers living with Thomas' in-laws the Olivers, with John Riley listed as born in Gringley. A quick looky at the map shows that this is north east of Worksop (Warsop, where my John Riley is later listed as being born) is south west of Worksop. Thomas is listed as a farm labourer, and John has no middle name.
The other one is a Thomas Riley, 75 year old widower living with his 32 year old daughter and John who is listed as his son. They are living in Stapleford and that is where it also says John was born - and that is south East of Worksop, on the edge of Nottingham itself. Thomas is listed as a farmer, from Dublin. This John is a John W though.
Number 2 seems more interesting, but number 1 seems easier to track back given that it tells me the wife's maiden name :-D
|
|
JustDinosaurJill
|
Report
|
2 Oct 2012 08:26 |
Just popped on to computer for a quick look. Glad it's arrived
I get the same thing Alison. Trouble is I've done too many changes of direction. But I don't care and it's keeping the little grey cells excercised which is why I enjoy this.
I've found an absolutely fascinating family with absolutely no connection to me. They married into a family who married into a family who married into one of hubby's lot. And to top it all a couple of weeks ago, I was chatting to a friend who seems to be related to this family through her mother. It's all good fun :-D
With luck be back this evening so if you need something looking for.......
xxJ
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
1 Oct 2012 21:51 |
Good result then!, well done, it's coming together...
Chris :)
|
|
Alison
|
Report
|
1 Oct 2012 20:47 |
Boing! AT LAST the marriage certificate turned up today! John Riley is listed as being 26 at the time of his marriage to Mary Mars in April 1872, she was 23. It's hard to read the handwriting but I think it says that John is a fireman - and his dad is listed as Thomas Riley, labourer. Mary's dad is listed as John Mars, bricklayer, which is what you sleuths had already worked out, so that confirms that!
So, now I have a father and a profession I will try and follow a trail from John :-D
Jill, I have mainly been concentrating on going back but I have also gone off down some other branches, I am more interested in my direct ancestry but as I run out of steam or fancy a change of direction I have also been looking down some branches to see what I can find :-D
|
|
JustDinosaurJill
|
Report
|
23 Sep 2012 19:23 |
Hi Alison. Don't forget to post as soon as you have the cert. Are you going to try to put branches on your tree or just go directly back as far as possible?
|
|
Alison
|
Report
|
23 Sep 2012 16:35 |
Yes indeed he has, Jill :-D. The pair of you are such good sleuths, thank you both very much :-D
I look forward to receiving their marriage certificate to see if that helps to confirm and pick up the trails knowing they are definitely the right ones...then soon it starts getting trickier as we start to get back before official records :-0
Thanks again for your help Chris and Jill (and everyone else who has contributed too!)
|
|
JustDinosaurJill
|
Report
|
23 Sep 2012 11:15 |
Neat find Chris. :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Only thing that didn't make sense was John's age on the 1861.
In 1851 he's 43 (1808) - roughly ten years older than Catherine 35 (1816)
and on 1861 he's lost twenty years - 32 (1829) with Catherine 44 (1817).
I looked at both images and that's what they both seem to say but I had a really close look at the way John's age is written. Although there is a bit of smudging, comparing it to the 3 shown in the Enumerator's total and another 5 on the image, I think it's 52 not 32 which puts him back his twenty years.
Chris has pulled a real rabbit out of the proverbial hat to find this one and he is spot on.
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
23 Sep 2012 08:44 |
1861 MARNES, John Head Married M 32 1829 Bricklayer Millhead, Essex (says West Ham!) MARNES, Catherine Wife Married F 44 1817 Essex (Plaistow) MARNES, William Son M 13 1848 (West Ham) Bricklayer MARNES, Mary Daughter F 12 1849 (Plaistow) MARNES, Thomas Son M 5 1856 (West Ham) MARNES, James Son M 2 1859 (West Ham) Piece: 1055 Folio: 96 Page: 16 Registration District: West Ham Civil Parish: All Saints Westham Municipal Borough: Address: 1, ..., Frances Street James Place, All Saints Westham County: Essex
(can see above, had to check Birth places)
Chris :)
(good news on Cert., well done!)
1841 (looks Mars on image?)
MARR, William M 50 1791 Ireland MARR, Bridget F 45 1796 Ireland MARR, John M 25 1816 Essex (Bricklayer) MARR, Elizabeth F 15 1826 Essex MARR, James M 9 1832 Essex BOXALL, Robert M 70 1771 BOXALL, Sarah F 60 1781 BOXALL, William M 40 1801 Piece: 323 Book/Folio: 5 Page: 5 Registration District: West Ham Civil Parish: West Ham Municipal Borough: Address: Church Street, West Ham, Church Street County: Essex
|
|
JustDinosaurJill
|
Report
|
22 Sep 2012 19:08 |
Hi Alison, I'd look for the Mars family this evening but I've been undercoating paint this week and as much as I've tried to avoid the side effects, I've not been successful so whatever I do, I just can't think straight and the paracetamol isn't working.
Been wracking the little grey cells with variations but wondered if a different name altogther was put down by the enumerator. So have you tried March or Marshall, Morse, Mers, Murs (playing with accents here)?
As a surname it is certainly interesting. Sadly I'm not suggestion any family connection but read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_family This is a surname website and gives some idea of where the name originated. It mentions possible variations. http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/Mars
As you already know, I like to try to disprove stuff because I think that way you have a chance of being right allowing for the fact that all records have not been transcribed. I heard this bit of Sherlock Holmes when I was very young and it stuck with me as being incredibly sensible and it's helped me throughout my life plus my own take on it of 'just because it seems obvious, doesn't mean that it is - but it might be' :-D
"You will not apply my precept," he said, shaking his head. "How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth? We know that he did not come through the door, the window, or the chimney. We also know that he could not have been concealed in the room, as there is no concealment possible. When, then, did he come?" The Sign of the Four, ch. 6 (1890) Sherlock Holmes in The Sign of the Four (Doubleday p. 111)
|
|
Alison
|
Report
|
22 Sep 2012 18:08 |
Thanks Jill - yes it's fascinating isn't it! It seems very likely that they are the right family in the 1851 census - I'm curious to know what happened to the Mars family in the 1861 census, the parents John and Catherine disappear completely but reappear in the 1871 census back in West Ham - it's got to be the same couple as the names and ages are right and he is still a bricklayer. I can't even find anything similar working on variants!
I might have to try a process of elimination on the Mary Mars in the 1861 census - although the age is right, Lt Totham is in the most rural of backwaters up the other end of Essex to West Ham - which was really east London. On the 1851 census her birthplace is listed as Romford (although on the 1881 I think it is somewhere else East London ish), the Mary Mars in the 1861 census it says "Chilham" but there isn't a Chilham - looking at the original text I think that says Witham, which is the nearest town to Little Totham so would make more sense for someone local to have found the place nearby to work as a groom...but then looking back to the 1851 census I can't see who that would be.
I have a feeling this is one of those ones where the spelling of the surname has morphed over the years :-D I have ordered the marriage certificate anyway so hopefully that will give me better leads for both John Riley and Mary Mars :-D
Thanks for your help!
|
|
JustDinosaurJill
|
Report
|
22 Sep 2012 15:10 |
Based on marriage 1872 less 18 years I figure she was born around or before 1854.
This is the only 1851 which makes sense for having been born East London. I don't know London geography but the other two entries were for Mary A 1851 b Liverpool/living Liverpool and Mary 1846 b Ireland/living Kensington
1851 Census Household Record Household Information Address Church Street Parish West Ham District West Ham, West Ham Administrative County Essex Householder 1 Name John Mars Age 43 Estimated Year of Birth 1808 Relationship to Head of Household Head Occupation Bricklayer Birth Place Romford Birth County Essex Householder 2 Name Catherine Mars Age 35 Estimated Year of Birth 1816 Relationship to Head of Household Wife Occupation Birth Place Romford Birth County Essex Householder 3 Name William Mars Age 4 Estimated Year of Birth 1847 Relationship to Head of Household Son Occupation Juvenile Birth Place Romford Birth County Essex Householder 4 Name Mary Ann Mars Age 3 Estimated Year of Birth 1848 Relationship to Head of Household Daughter Occupation Juvenile Birth Place Romford Birth County Essex
POSSIBLE but don't accept it's right
1861 Census Household Record Household Information Address Little Totham Hill Parish Little Totham District Maldon, St Peter Administrative County Essex Householder 1 Name Jhon Granger Age 38 Estimated Year of Birth 1823 Relationship to Head of Household Head Occupation Miller Birth Place ... Birth County Essex Householder 2 Name Sarah Jean Granger Age 35 Estimated Year of Birth 1826 Relationship to Head of Household Wife Occupation Miller Wife Birth Place Maldon Birth County Essex Householder 3 Name James ... Granger Age 3 Estimated Year of Birth 1858 Relationship to Head of Household Son Occupation Millers Son Birth Place Little Braxted Birth County Essex Householder 4 Name Sarah Catherin Granger Age 9 Estimated Year of Birth 1852 Relationship to Head of Household Daughter Occupation Miller Daughter Birth Place Little Totham Birth County Essex Householder 5 Name Martha Jane Emblston Age 18 Estimated Year of Birth 1843 Relationship to Head of Household Servant Occupation Nurse Maid Birth Place Raleigh Birth County Essex Householder 6 Name Sarah Spells Age 53 Estimated Year of Birth 1808 Relationship to Head of Household Servant Occupation Cook Birth Place Tillingham Birth County Essex Householder 7 Name Mary Mars Age 14 Estimated Year of Birth 1847 Relationship to Head of Household Servant Occupation Groom Birth Place Chilham Birth County Essex
The 1871 is the one already posted. I think to be 100% certain the marriage cert is needed. I can't find the marriage on FamilySearch. Will be back later. Going to deal with a headache which just won't go.
xxJ
|
|
Alison
|
Report
|
22 Sep 2012 09:32 |
Oooh exciting news - the birth certificate is here, and JustDinosaurJill you were quite right - mother's maiden name is Mars :-D :-D :-D
So now I need to get the marriage certificate for John Riley and Mary Mars, to see if that has any info about John's father, yes?
|
|
Alison
|
Report
|
17 Sep 2012 11:49 |
Ok, Ernest's birth certificate ordered - fingers crossed it gives enough information to pick up the scent again!
His wife Elizabeth's death certificate also arrived today, she died in the West Ham Union Infirmary in 1914, leaving 5 orphaned kids, one of whom was my nan. I wonder what became of them all - another line of enquiry to follow up!
|
|
Alison
|
Report
|
16 Sep 2012 22:13 |
Thank you for that, you are all so helpful :-D I told dad today that his grandad didn't die in an industrial accident after all, but died of pneumonia at home and he was really surprised as he says he distinctly remembers his mum telling him that...but she had only just turned 3 so wouldn't necessarily remember or have been told the truth (of course it's always possible that my dad doesn't remember correctly either :-D )
OK so next step is to get Ernest's birth certificate - even though his marriage and death certificate had him as earlier than 1881, I'm absolutely certain he is the first quarter of 1881 listed earlier. How many other Ernest Riley's in Essex/East London, father John who was an engine driver/fitter, with a sister who married someone called Palmer can there be?! Hopefully that will give me a better trail with his mother's maiden name.
I've also had a look at the 1861 census and think I may have found his father John there too, there is a 16-year old John Riley as a lodger working as a carter on a farm with a family called Bayohaw (bet that's a mis-spelling!). On the findmypast listing it says place of birth Worksop but looking at the handwritten document I think it says Warsop so it does tie in - so maybe he got fed up doing farm labour and headed to London at some point within the next 10 years to go and work on the railways - hence lodging in the Hudson Buildings as a Locomotive stoker in 1871. Or alternatively, is this the other John Riley who JustDinosaurJill found above, but then disproved, as he was also born Warsop and had moved out of his Riley family home by the 1861 census. *head explodes*
Thanks again. Fun this, innit :-D
|
|
mgnv
|
Report
|
16 Sep 2012 19:00 |
Alison - the record you want to check out is this one:
1911 England Census Summary Books about Riley Mr Name: Riley Mr Number of Males: 4 Number of Females: 3 Household schedule number: 121 Street Address: 11 Downsell Road Civil parish: Leyton Ecclesiastical parish: Leytonstone Holy Trinity Harrow Green County/Island: Essex Country: England Residence Year: 1911 Registration district: West Ham Registration District Number: 188 Sub-registration district: South Leyton Sub-Registration District Number: 8 ED, institution, or vessel: 10 Neighbors: View others on page Piece: 512
It's free on Ancestry right now, and you can click on the image and easily page thru the book. Downsell Rd ran 2-128 (evens) and 1-115 (odds). Apart from 2 houses that look like they're formally divided (54, 54a & 70, 70a) there's only 10 houses with 2 families: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15 & 6, 10, 12. My guess is the low #s are probably older houses of a difft design that allowed multiple familes more readily. (Whenever the landlord could get 2 rents, he would.) Incidentally, I seem to recall that London's leading landlord at that time, with abt 10% of rentals, was the C of E.
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
16 Sep 2012 09:33 |
Would say at the moment, that the Birth Cert. is the way to go!...
Chris :)
|
|
JannieAnnie
|
Report
|
16 Sep 2012 05:26 |
Hi
I expect you have checked this out already but Downsell Road (E15 aka Stratford postcode) is a turning joining/coming off Leyton Road.
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?x=538606&y=185713&z=110&sv=downsell+road&st=6&tl=Map+of+Downsell+Road,+London,+E_15&searchp=ids.srf&map
Also is it possible that they were living in a property on Leyton Road just prior to Census night but moved after they received the form (maybe having started/completed it before and not expecting anything to change) to a property round the corner on Downsell Road? Not sure how the delivery/collection of the actual forms worked in 1911.
As to whether two families would have been living in one Victorian terraced house - that is quite likely. I have family in a property in Hackney in 1911, and as I was struggling to connect the Head to any parents, when I looked again (at the address rather than the person) I found them at the same address! So they could all have been "together" - but completed 2 Census returns OR they rented separate parts of the same house and my great grandfather and his father (gg grandfather) completed Census returns as heads of their own families. Also lots of properties on Victorian terraces are now divided into flats - and now have the benefit of being flats 'A' or 'B' etc
EDIT: Just on the 1880 / 1881 point - if he was born late in 1880 (December) then he could easily have been registered in the first quarter (Jan/Feb/Mar) 1881. Not sure if anyone else has answered that for you.
|
|
JustDinosaurJill
|
Report
|
15 Sep 2012 17:51 |
Hi Alison.
Sorry no fresh ideas from me. Maybe one of the others will come up with an idea or suggestion.
Jill
|
|
Alison
|
Report
|
15 Sep 2012 10:05 |
Thanks again guys. Well, Ernest's death certificate arrived today and rumour #1 that he was killed in an accident at the docks doesn't seem to be correct - according to his death certificate, he died at home of pneumonia! Maybe the illness was as a consequence of an accident at the docks - it was August after all - but maybe it's just one of those random rumours which has appeared over the years. My gran would have been 3 at the time so I doubt she would have had clear memories of what happened.
The death certificate doesn't really tell me anything I don't already know - that still has him as 31 years old whereas I think he was 30, the only Ernest Riley I can find who fits the bill was born in first quarter of 1881 (he also has himself down as 25 on his marriage in 1905). The only slightly confusing thing is that it has the address of death as 11 Downsell Road, Leyton - I went to check the 1911 census and yes, they are listed as living there at that time. But there is also another family listed as living there, and looking at the original handwritten entry, he had actually written the address as Leyton Road, Stratford and this has been crossed out and in a different handwriting 11 Downsell Rd is written in. Does this mean that he filled the form in before the official date and they had moved by that time? Is it normal for two households to be living in a typical victorian terrace?
I think I'm going to have to get hold of his birth certificate next (I'm sure he is the early 1881 birth even though he and his wife seem to think he was 1880). Thanks :-D
|
|
JustDinosaurJill
|
Report
|
11 Sep 2012 22:08 |
And to prove that John Davison Riley is NOT your direct and relevant JR. I found him in the 1901. It proves the value of disproving what you think you have found and might stop you mixing him up at some point with the right JR.
1901 Census Record
Personal Information Name John Davidson Riley Relation to Head of Family Head Age Last Birthday 56 Sex Male Profession or Occupation Colliery Belt Man Above Ground Condition as to Marriage Married Where Born Notts Warsop Address 3 Sherwood Street Civil Parish Warsop Rural District Town or Village or Hamlet Warsop Ecclesiastical Parish Warsop With Sookholme Parliamentary Borough or Division Bassetlaw County Borough, Municipal Borough or Urban District Warsop Administrative County Nottinghamshire Ward of Municipal Borough or Urban District Warsop Language Infirmity Reference Information Folio 24 Page 1 Piece 3131
|