Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Use Old Tree Option?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Gai | Report | 21 Jul 2012 12:10 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maryanna | Report | 21 Jul 2012 12:01 |
I'm not shouting too loudly but I still have the old tree on my ipad. Not on my laptop or PC though. Any changes I make on one device appear on them all. I wonder how much longer I am going to have it for ? Anybody else still able to see it ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 20 Jul 2012 08:57 |
I have rechecked and found that the scrolling/paging is working correctly. |
|||
|
Gai | Report | 20 Jul 2012 08:26 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 20 Jul 2012 07:59 |
It's true they need to sort out the scrolling for the list of trees, but you can use your contacts list to access other trees. To get back to your own tree click on View which seems to be partially hidden by the search box. |
|||
|
Anita | Report | 20 Jul 2012 07:48 |
As I have just commented on Feedback, I appreciate that software like everything else has to move on. That said this has become a farce, one problem gets sorted and then there are more. This morning i am unable to scroll through the list of trees that contacts share with me at best I can get as far as the 'C's. I tested one and found that I could not easily get back to my own tree. I am so frustrated! |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 20 Jul 2012 07:39 |
Face it, the old GR tree was just too basic for modern Family History research. It needed to go so that better facilities can be added. Retaining it was just holding the site back and keeping the GR staff from correcting faults with the new tree |
|||
|
LadyScozz | Report | 20 Jul 2012 06:20 |
the old tree wasn't broken, it had a few cracks in it. |
|||
|
William | Report | 19 Jul 2012 22:32 |
One little thing I've noticed in adding on the new Tree.If your adding a partner of a male,don't go to editing details for the female,to avoid duplication add some detail of when the marriage took place on the male's details.Then go and edit the female's birth etcI don't know as yet whether the reverse is true for adding a female's partner?. |
|||
|
Chrissie2394 | Report | 19 Jul 2012 21:59 |
Feedback sent. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 19 Jul 2012 21:31 |
Yes, I prefure the Old Tree, if it's not broken don't fix it. Give us the two options again. :-P |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 19 Jul 2012 19:31 |
Yes, candles weren't broke either, nor were gas lamps - life moves on, like it or not. |
|||
|
William | Report | 19 Jul 2012 18:46 |
Yes I've been breaking out in bouts of uncontrollable shouting at the screen since trying to use the new one! |
|||
|
Walt | Report | 19 Jul 2012 16:49 |
I have tried to change to the new tree but it is just too cumbersome. I signed up using the old tree but removing a facility without reasonable warning IE. when you renew subscription is unreasonable and I think GR have seriously misled subscribers over what they offer. Refund? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
William | Report | 19 Jul 2012 14:35 |
Thanks Sally,though I agree with you that if it ain't broke don't fix it,the powers that are supposed to be,rarely listen.lol |
|||
|
Sally | Report | 19 Jul 2012 14:25 |
i have complained on feed back suggest you do the same |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
William | Report | 19 Jul 2012 14:08 |
Thanks George,I was very much at home using the old tree,finding the new one extremely cumbersome to say the least! |
|||
|
George_of_Westbury | Report | 19 Jul 2012 13:49 |
yes it has been removed today, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
William | Report | 19 Jul 2012 13:47 |
Has the option to "use old tree" gone? |