Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Parents on birth certificates
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Angela | Report | 5 Mar 2011 16:18 |
Hi |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 5 Mar 2011 16:38 |
Most likely not .The babys father may be named on baptismal records as some priests insisted !! also she may have taken out a bastardy bond for maintenance. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 5 Mar 2011 17:11 |
Hi |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 5 Mar 2011 18:02 |
This sort of thing was very common. We have similar examples right up the the 1920's If they got married soon after then there it is a good bet that Mr Kirk was his father. and Ms Clark the mother. Occasionally we have seen the names the other way around so John Brown Evans was the son of Mr Evans and Miss Brown |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 5 Mar 2011 18:16 |
Hi |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 6 Mar 2011 11:45 |
Who can register the birth? |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 6 Mar 2011 14:08 |
Thank you very much Sat Nav for explaining the procedure to me I am extremely grateful, I know that both unmarried partners needed to attend together because my partner and I have been together 17 years and when we had our first child he worked away and they stated that I could not put his name on the cert if he was not there, so I waited until he returned home. |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 6 Mar 2011 17:04 |
Bear in mind that is the current position. Back in 1843 things were rather different.....! |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 6 Mar 2011 17:31 |
IGP |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 6 Mar 2011 17:43 |
Yes, it does, and that's just the gem you always hope to find, but would not have known if you had not sent for the cert. |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 6 Mar 2011 19:02 |
Hi |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 7 Mar 2011 01:00 |
Angela |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Cheshiremaid | Report | 7 Mar 2011 02:35 |
|
|||
|
SueMaid | Report | 7 Mar 2011 03:21 |
Strangely enough my great grandmother had both her mother's name and father's name on her 1841 birth certificate and the parent's never married. Eventually my 2 x great grandmother married and had more children but my 2 x great grandfather never married. I like to think there was a lovely romantic but sad story there but will probably never know. |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 7 Mar 2011 10:14 |
Wasn't there some sort of technicality that prevented the esteemed Mr Milliband from being named as the father on his child's birth certificate because he was too busy to attend the registration? I thought that because they were unmarried he had to be present? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 7 Mar 2011 12:47 |
Milliband could have completed a Statutory Declaration Form if he was too busy to attend the Register Office in person, or perhaps he was too busy to do that too.....! |
|||
|
Tenerife Sun | Report | 7 Mar 2011 14:13 |
Google bastardy bonds followed by the name of the place/county you are looking for. I did this for Sussex and found several online although not for the name I wanted. It's worth a try. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 8 Mar 2011 16:55 |
Hi |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 21 Mar 2011 18:58 |
OR a first spouse of one or t'other had just died! |
|||
Researching: |