Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Parish Records
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Betty | Report | 12 May 2010 22:50 |
Hi, I can't add anything to your request but just thought I'd let you know that my mothers maiden name was Ricketts. wonder if we have a connection ? |
|||
|
Middy | Report | 13 May 2010 10:38 |
Hi Betty - I have sent you a PM x |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 14 May 2010 05:51 |
Middy, I've been dabbling about. Here's some thoughts. You probably have most of these. What do you think? |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 14 May 2010 06:29 |
??? |
|||
|
Middy | Report | 14 May 2010 16:23 |
Hi Ozi |
|||
|
Middy | Report | 14 May 2010 16:51 |
Just had a quick look on Ancestry and George Frederick is unfortunately not a relation - different parents Louise is strange really we found her marriage and children but couldn't find the birth - can find two deaths under her married name - ie: Louisa Lawson and a Louise Lawson so now I am even more confused as both born 1907 and to be honest on the census she is Louise but on her marriage she is Louisa and I know the marriage is definately correct. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 14 May 2010 22:03 |
Is the 14 year old Elizabeth in 1901 a daughter? Have you found her? |
|||
|
Middy | Report | 14 May 2010 22:10 |
Hi Ozi |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 14 May 2010 22:25 |
Any chance she was Charles's daughter but not Elizabeth's? |
|||
|
Middy | Report | 14 May 2010 22:36 |
To be honest Ozi I'm not sure I presume she was Charles and Emily's daughter - but on the 1881 before Charles and Emily were married Charles was on there with someone called Pheolis and she was wife to the head of house which he was - but I can't find a marriage, again I have even got the original census and spelling looks like it has been transcribed - I have even tried it as Phylis |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 15 May 2010 23:37 |
Looking at 1881 the wife could be Phoebe which means the birth index for Elizabeth Phoebe is a real chance. |
|||
|
Middy | Report | 16 May 2010 10:13 |
Hi Ozi |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 16 May 2010 22:44 |
Same here. I found a Pheby (mistranscribed Phehy) Brown in 1861 who is a possible candidate but unable to find anything else. |
|||
|
Middy | Report | 17 May 2010 06:20 |
Thanks for looking Ozi, I do appreciate it. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 17 May 2010 08:31 |
Keep us up-to-date if you find anything interesting. |
|||
|
Middy | Report | 17 May 2010 20:47 |
Not sure whether this counts as something interesting Ozi but I have received an email from one of the churches telling me where the records are held and that they charge £40 per hour to research the information. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 17 May 2010 21:35 |
Goodness me, that's horrifying. |
|||
|
Middy | Report | 18 May 2010 08:21 |
I will have a look into that Ozi - thanks, I couldn't believe the price of the other one. |