Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Age not stated at marriage
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
dotski | Report | 3 Apr 2010 09:25 |
I have a marriage certificate dated 1862 and there is some writing where the age should be of the people marrying. I cannot make out what it says. Does anyone know or has anyone seen anything like this? Does anyone have any idea why a age would not be given at marriage? It does appear that the people involved were not able to write as a cross is given as their mark, could this mean they do not know when they were born!!!!!!?????? |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2010 09:28 |
It couldn't say "of full age" by any chance? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
dotski | Report | 3 Apr 2010 09:32 |
it could be just the word full, would that mean age 21? or 21 years and above as both parties have this stated and one of them should be older according to census. Was hoping to establish age a bit more as the surname is Hooley and the area I am looking is full of the surname Hooley, need to establish the right person and his age for parentage. |
|||
|
dotski | Report | 3 Apr 2010 09:35 |
just looked again brummiejan (you from b'ham by chance?) i think it does say the word full |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2010 09:46 |
The age won't really help you much it seems. I believe it would mean 21 or over. Have you considered all the other clues - father obviously, plus witnesses? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
dotski | Report | 3 Apr 2010 10:16 |
Hello brummiejan, we practically next door - i am from dreaded derbyshire area - no-one likes derbyshire record searching, heard lots of moans. My man is Samuel Hooley marrying Eliza Bates (Samuel should be 1832 born to John Hooley (trouble is John may have married 3 women - possibly Sarah Trowell (who i think is Samuels mother but not sure) and two Mary's who everyone has a different opionion of maiden names.Looking in the Draycott area of Derbyshire. Think I may have to visit Matlock records office for a day out. Lots of info on IGI but it varies on opinion as to parentage, would prefer to get it right as Samuel is my Great Grandfather and I would feel terrible if i got it wrong. The Draycott area is teeming with Hooley and Bates lines. |
|||
|
dotski | Report | 3 Apr 2010 10:22 |
Hello Joan |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2010 10:46 |
Would you belieive it - Derek's Derbyshire thread has just been nudged to the top of the Records Office board! It might be worth asking him to have a look for you. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 3 Apr 2010 17:39 |
This is the thread you want, Dorothy. Go to the address bar at the top and alter the number to 1091204, or open a new window and copy and past this lot: |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 3 Apr 2010 17:41 |
Oh, Dorothy's already found Derek. |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 3 Apr 2010 17:57 |
I looked up Stevensons in Draycott in 1861 of appropriate age to be witnesses and there are four that seem likely - Edward, Harriet, Alexander and Jane. |
|||
|
dotski | Report | 3 Apr 2010 18:05 |
Thanks for all your help everyone |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 3 Apr 2010 18:52 |
I think Derek would prefer a flask of something rather stronger than tea. |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 3 Apr 2010 19:14 |
Dorothy, I forgot Derek has a broken ankle so he's taken a temporary holiday from the tent. |
|||
|
dotski | Report | 3 Apr 2010 20:10 |
Hello all |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2010 20:19 |
I have a friend from Derbyshire who is responsible for telling me this: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 3 Apr 2010 20:39 |
I'm afraid people from the Birmingham area of the country tend to get things a little wrong. The rhyme is: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2010 20:43 |
Well, I have it from a Derbyshire woman - maybe says more about her view of men than Derbyshire! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 3 Apr 2010 20:51 |
Oh, Derbyshire men, well that might be different. I have to be careful here, cos I can't remember where Derek is from, it might be Staffs, so I'm safe, but if not - well, there are always a few exceptions to the rule. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 3 Apr 2010 20:53 |
Praise indeed!! I have just one thing to say - Ozzy for Prime Minister. |
|||
Researching: |