Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
explanation please.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
mgnv | Report | 22 Mar 2010 02:35 |
I've never looked at an English 1911 census, but certainly on the 1901, there's no year of birth mentioned. What appears is George's age of 24. |
|||
|
Nickydownsouth | Report | 21 Mar 2010 23:02 |
if ever in doubt always try here first before spending your money.....us super sleuths { polite name for Nosey} are always willing to poke our noses...{sorry I mean investigate further} in to anyones family history |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
George | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:58 |
Nick and Dee. Thanks for that. I'll let you know the result and no doubt be seeking help again. |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:52 |
Looks like Nicky's changing her hobby??? |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:52 |
Uumm.... not sure that the 1871 would help? |
|||
|
Nickydownsouth | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:51 |
Might be a good idea to use mothers name Babara as reference check on future orders, if this one on order isn`t the correct one..........would have thought there would be less chance of George Miller with mother babara being duplicated than George miller with a father of the same name.......only 2 come up on the 1881 in the time frame, and the other one hasn`t a father called George so fingers crossed you`ve got the right one... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:46 |
Hi George, |
|||
|
George | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:41 |
If I am on the right track, you are correct that his occupation was Stoker in 1881. presume a Stoker could be a Railway Fireman as the 1891census |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:32 |
It is difficult with such a popular name George, I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you. |
|||
|
George | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:30 |
'Nosey' BatMansDaughter, yes, you are 100% correct but I'm still swimming in a sea of uncertainty. Just have to wait and see if I get the correct BC |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:26 |
George remember that the census age can be out by nearly 1 full year, if George was born April 28th 1876 then this would show on a census of the birth at 1877....... so I would definately be looking at the 1876 births for him. |
|||
|
George | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:26 |
2 of the entries on the Birth Register show 'Gateshead' (both 18760 |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:20 |
George..... just because I am a very nosey person is this your Grandfather; |
|||
|
George | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:20 |
Yes..his fathers name was George Miller, somewhat predictable! |
|||
|
Nickydownsouth | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:10 |
Do you have his fathers name from his marriage cert.? or earlier census.? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
George | Report | 21 Mar 2010 22:02 |
Thanks for that Nicky. Out of a choice of 3 Birth Certificates |
|||
|
Nickydownsouth | Report | 21 Mar 2010 21:48 |
No George..... Any death information is only as reliable as the informant....maybe whoever registered the death/arranged the headstone thought he was a year younger than he actually was...or depending on when in the year his birth was in relation to his date of death, it can alter an age.... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
George | Report | 21 Mar 2010 21:42 |
Grandfather (George Miller) appears in both 1901 and 1911 census |