Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Census look up please (if you can)
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
nuttybongo | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:03 |
Hi there, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:09 |
1901 census (Evelyn appears to be a female. Son has been crossed out and daughter put in it's place.):- |
|||
|
RutlandBelle | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:11 |
Do you mean 1911 census he would only have been 11/12 in 1901 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:12 |
For reference |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:13 |
on the 1901 image Son has been crossed through and replaced with 'Dau' |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
nuttybongo | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:16 |
hi there, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:16 |
possible on the 1911 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:17 |
you can search free on the 1911 but have to buy credits to view, they are not cheap ! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
RutlandBelle | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:18 |
1911 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:26 |
? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:30 |
This looks like the birth:- |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:35 |
Are you certain that the marriage you found in 1904 is the correct one as he would only have been 16 at the time (although I know this is perfectly possible)? |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:40 |
I am sketchy on my Yorks geography... on bmd ... two females so Evelyn male? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
nuttybongo | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:40 |
hi there folks, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:42 |
I think nutty bongo is looking at the 1904 marriage where the two females are called Sarah and Katie. |
|||
|
nuttybongo | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:48 |
see folks, i said i was lossing it today lol. He was born in 1890 ish in the 1891 census he is 2, sorry about that. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 29 Mar 2009 16:48 |
Have PMd with the (likely) details from CWGC in case you don't have |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
nuttybongo | Report | 29 Mar 2009 17:09 |
many thanks for doing everything for me folks. See how easy it is for me to confuse everyone. Think i may have a laydown now lol. Thanks again |
|||
Researching: |