Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
how do you find out a date of birth without certif
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Gillian | Report | 27 Mar 2009 13:15 |
Good afternoon folks, does anyone know, how would you find out a person's date of birth without getting a birth certificate???? |
|||
|
Jill 2011 (aka Warrior Princess of Cilla!) | Report | 27 Mar 2009 13:26 |
Have you found him on 1881 census and what does it say on there as birthplace. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gillian | Report | 27 Mar 2009 13:35 |
Hi, the 1881 census says Wigan, aged 5. All the other siblings say Wigan. Yes, it is possible he was born elsewhere. If I just look at my mum's siblings for example, all born Wigan except one which was Nottingham. The fammily moved to Notts temp for mining work. So even though James' siblings are all Wigan I realise he could have been born elsewhere. Mine field... |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 27 Mar 2009 13:46 |
Gillian, a tip - please break up your notes into paragraphs. Many of us are of an age where this sort of block of type is just not intelligible. |
|||
|
Gillian | Report | 27 Mar 2009 13:53 |
Sorry Heather, |
|||
|
RobG | Report | 27 Mar 2009 13:54 |
Quick thought. If you have him on the 1881 census when he was 5, then hopefully he was with both parents. If so, try finding their marriage, as it could be they were married after his birth and he may be under the mother's maiden name. |
|||
|
RobG | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:01 |
Another thought. Was he the eldest? If so, it seems a quite common practice for the mother-to-be to return to wherever her folks came from to have the first child. |
|||
|
Gillian | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:02 |
From his burial record he was buried with his father Thomas and ... Emily, so it is possible that Emily is his mother. I know it is my James in that grave, the address on the record is the same as the one on my mum's birth certificate. I have the marriage certificate for Thomas and Emily 5th Feb 1874 at Warrington. I have the birth certificates for all the other siblings with Thomas and Emily nee Berrow as parents. The first child was born May 1874. James is the second child. |
|||
|
Gillian | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:05 |
ps, Emily was from Hereford. Hereford register office has no record of James. I have tried Warrington too. |
|||
|
RobG | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:09 |
So he's not the James Dean, registered Dec 1875 in Warrington (8c 160) then? |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:10 |
What is his Regiment No from the Ancestry WW1 record? Did anyone look at the images for you? |
|||
|
Gillian | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:16 |
no, he's not that one or the one in 1876. |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:16 |
Hi Gill, |
|||
|
Gillian | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:21 |
Hi Dee, |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:32 |
Oh yes Gil, much better - minor point, but you will get more response if us oldies can read it easily. :) |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:44 |
He must have lied about his age when he joined the Army - no date of birth but his age is given as 33. Going by the 1911 age of 36, he should have been 40/41 when he joined up in 1915. |
|||
|
Gillian | Report | 27 Mar 2009 14:51 |
ah.... didn't know that. 33??? He must've thought he would be too old. How interesting. mmm |
|||
|
basman | Report | 27 Mar 2009 19:32 |
Hi Gillian, |
|||
|
Gillian | Report | 28 Mar 2009 10:50 |
Hi Basman, yep, tried all that. Wigan Register Office were very kind. They checked all the entries. To add to the confusion, there was a family in City Rd Pemberton with son James and father Thomas but the register office said it was not a match. He is a little bugger!!!! |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 28 Mar 2009 12:28 |
Registration didn't become compulsory until 1875 and I would imagine that there were still people who didn't bother even after this date. Perhaps his birth was not registered. |