Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
cant find family on 1891 census help please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Carter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 10:57 |
hi i have this family on the 1881 and the 1901 but cant find them on the 1891 if anyone can help it would be much appreciated. aslo does anyone know if there is a site similar to lancashire online parish records for yorkshire? |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 4 Feb 2009 12:41 |
There isn't an online parish clerk for Yorkshire but this site has some transcriptions: |
|||
|
liquidamber¨°o.O | Report | 4 Feb 2009 13:05 |
Name: Robinson Bottomley |
|||
|
Carter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 14:21 |
thanks leonie andamber you are both spot on thanks so much but where is the illusive robinson |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 4 Feb 2009 19:25 |
Leonie - I can't find that 1891 census on Ancestry. |
|||
|
Carter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 21:06 |
yeah i am having trouble finding it without the ref/folio/page etc.. any ideas |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 4 Feb 2009 21:21 |
this is crazy |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 4 Feb 2009 21:34 |
Piece 3599 Folio 135 page 46 (ED7) |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 4 Feb 2009 21:37 |
No, it is there on Ancestry - not sure how it has been transcribed though |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 4 Feb 2009 21:42 |
Greenway |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 4 Feb 2009 23:05 |
darned transcriber error!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Carter | Report | 4 Feb 2009 23:09 |
well done sylvia what a great find. you are a superstar no wonder i couldnt find it |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 5 Feb 2009 00:02 |
Ancestry (and the LDS) have problems with relationships when the head of the household is not first, or is not named as head. They also have problems differentiating the households. (Here Beatrice, say, is identified as Broallbent's daur, but not Alice's nor Lydia's daur.) |
|||
|
Carter | Report | 5 Feb 2009 01:29 |
thanks once again for all your help it is much appreciated |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 5 Feb 2009 01:46 |
How many Robinson Bottomly's do you think there might be??? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 5 Feb 2009 01:47 |
answer .................. two!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 5 Feb 2009 03:25 |
I have just submitted corrections for the Bottomley family on the 1891. It will take about 6 weeks before anything shows up. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 5 Feb 2009 08:59 |
Linda - I imagine you've seen the esrlier censuses, but just in case: |
|||
|
Carter | Report | 5 Feb 2009 09:45 |
thanks once again you are superstars and your help is very much appreciated i am always amazed by peoples generosity with their time and effort that they give freely on this site |