Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
11 Dec 2008 17:50 |
Thank you for looking - it is appreciated. I'll certainly request the marriage certificate and see where it leads.
Thank you once again for all your help and searching :)
Kind regards
Rachel
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
11 Dec 2008 17:29 |
No sign of any of the births under any variant of Cain.
There is this marriage though:
Marriages Mar 1876 ATKINS Mary Prescott 8b 907 Kean Michael Prescott 8b 907
There's a Mary Atkins from 1871 that seems to match.
Rose
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
11 Dec 2008 16:59 |
Hi Rose,
Thank you for your replies. Bartholomew did state his father as being Michael in 1920 when he married, and it looks as though you have found the family in the census' - thank you very much.
I now need to try and fine the correct birth references for the family, so that I can request the marriage certificate.
I would really appreciate it anyone can find some of these births - thanking you in anticipation!
Kind regards
Rachel
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
11 Dec 2008 00:05 |
1891:
1891 England Census about Mary Cane Name: Mary Cane Age: 33 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1858 Relation: Wife Spouse's Name: Michael Gender: Female Where born: St Helens, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Eccleston Ecclesiastical parish: St John Town: St Helens County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Prescot Sub registration district: St Helens ED, institution, or vessel: 19 Household Members: Name Age Michael Cane 39 Mary Cane 33 Mary C Cane 13 Elizabeth Cane 6 Bartholomew Cane 3 Rose
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:58 |
This looks to be the family:
Household:
Name Relation Marital Status Gender Age Birthplace Occupation Disability Michael KANE Lodger (Head) M Male 30 Dublin, Ireland Labourer Mary KANE Wife M Female 23 St Helens, Lancashire, England Mary Ellen KANE Daur U Female 2 St Helens, Lancashire, England Martin EGIN Lodger W Male 90 Ireland Labourer Bridget KELLY Lodger W Female 40 Ireland Mary KELLY Daur O Female 11 Ireland
Source Information: Dwelling 31 Liverpool Street Census Place Eccleston In Prescot, Lancashire, England Family History Library Film 1341894 Public Records Office Reference RG11 Piece / Folio 3736 / 27 Page Number 10
Rose
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:41 |
Rachel,
Did Bartholomew list his father as Michael in 1920?
Rose
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:40 |
Rachel,
You need to forget the Chorlton ones then. They are not your family.
Mary Ellen is still with Michael and Mary in 1901:
1901 England Census about Michael Kain Name: Michael Kain Age: 47 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1854 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: Ireland Civil Parish: South Manchester Ecclesiastical parish: Hulme Holy Trinity County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Chorlton Sub registration district: Hulme ED, institution, or vessel: 10 Household schedule number: 90 Household Members: Name Age Annie Kain 15 Catherine Kain 17 Lizzie Kain 11 Lucy Kain 7 Maggie Kain 13 Mary Kain 42 Mary E Kain 23 Michael Kain 47 Thomas Kain 21 Joseph Ratcliffe 17
Rose
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:38 |
I suppose another way to know if we have the right family would be to see if we can find these on the 1901 census and to see which area they are living in.
At least I now have the birth references for 2 of the Cain's so I'll request 1 and see where that leads.
I'm going to bed now - will look at this thread tomorrow afternoon.
Thank you.
Regards
Rachel
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:34 |
Hi,
My relative that I am trying to trace is Bartholomew - however, he was born in Ireland, so I need to find details of his siblings' births to continue to find details of his parents etc.
Bartholomew married in Prescot in 1920 and I have this certificate and I know when he died (again in Prescot)
I am fairly sure we have the right family - especially as the children's names, area and parents names are consistent. I realise that there is discrepancy with the ages, but I've found that with other ancestors.
Thanks again for your help - it is appreciated.
Regards
Rachel
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:24 |
Who is it that is your relative? We need to make sure we're following the correct Cain(e)s.
Rose
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:21 |
Rachel,
The ages are different again in 1891 so there are other possible births now.
Rose
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:19 |
I'm not sure the family you have in 1901 is the same one.
Here they are in 1891 and there's no Elizabeth or Bart:
1891 England Census about Michael Cain Name: Michael Cain Age: 40 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1851 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: Ireland Civil Parish: Hulme Ecclesiastical parish: St Mark Town: Manchester County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Chorlton Sub registration district: Hulme ED, institution, or vessel: 7 Household Members: Name Age Michael Cain 40 Mary Cain 32 Mary E Cain 14 Thomas Cain 12 Kate Cain 8 Ann Cain 5 Margaret Cain 3 Ellen Ratcliffe 28 Martin J Ratcliffe 6 James Hy Ratcliffe 3 Rose
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:19 |
Thank you very much for your help. I was beginning to wonder where I needed to look - and seeing 2 different places of birth really threw me.
Thank you once again for finding those birth references and the marriage reference - I can now send off for some certificates and see where they lead.
Many thanks!
Rachel
|
|
Pat from Wesham
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:14 |
1891 England Census 1891 England Census Name: Thomas Cain Age: 12 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1879 Relation: Son Father's Name: Michael Mother's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Hulme Ecclesiastical parish: St Mark Town: Manchester County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Employment status: View Image Registration district: Chorlton Sub registration district: Hulme ED, institution, or vessel: 7 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Michael Cain 40 Mary Cain 32 Mary E Cain 14 Thomas Cain 12 Kate Cain 8 Ann Cain 5 Margaret Cain 3 Ellen Ratcliffe 28 Martin J Ratcliffe 6 James Hy Ratcliffe 3 This is them in 1891, I think I would go with Manchester rather than St Helens
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:12 |
Births Mar 1878 Caine Mary Ellen Chorlton 8c 821
Births Mar 1880 Caine Thomas Chorlton 8c 812
Rose
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 23:05 |
I see, but I have also found some of them in the 1901 census:
Name: Barthlomey Cain Age: 12 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1889 Relation: Brother Gender: Male Where born: Ireland Civil Parish: St Helen Ecclesiastical parish: St John the Evangelist Town: St Helen County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Employment status: View Image Registration district: Prescot Sub registration district: St Helens ED, institution, or vessel: 23 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 123 Household Members: Name Age Barthlomey Cain 12 b Ireland Elizabeth Cain 15 b St Helens Mary Ellen Cain 23 b St Helens Source Citation: Class: RG13; Piece: 3522; Folio: 161; Page: 27.
On this census, both Elizabeth and Mary Ellen were born in St Helens, and Bartholomew in Ireland, yet on other census' Elizabeth and Mary Ellen appear born in Manchester. I am not sure which census information is right - any suggestions please?
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 22:59 |
Marriages Dec 1877 CAIN Michael Chorlton 8c 1080 CONNOLLY Mary Chorlton 8c 1080
Rose
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 22:57 |
St Helen's is Prescot district.
The family you list is in Chorlton.
Rose
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 22:51 |
Hi,
Here are some of them in the 1881 census:
Michael Cain 30 Mary Cain 23 Mary Ellen Cain 3 Thomas Cain 1 Martin Connolly 43 Catherine Connolly 20 Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 3925; Folio: 15; Page: 24; Line: ; GSU roll: 1341937.
I thought that as Thomas was 1 yr old here that his birth reference would be easy to find.
Regards
Rachel
|
|
Pat from Wesham
|
Report
|
10 Dec 2008 22:40 |
Rachel have you found them in the 1901 census or before, if you post details it will be easier to find them for you, ie where they where living at time of census.
Pat.
|