Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Only one name on the marriages
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 7 Nov 2008 08:03 |
Marriages Jun 1858 |
|||
|
Richard in Perth | Report | 7 Nov 2008 07:46 |
... ties in with this birth, too: |
|||
|
Richard in Perth | Report | 7 Nov 2008 07:44 |
how about this marriage - Bromley isn't that far away from Deptford: |
|||
|
Richard in Perth | Report | 7 Nov 2008 07:42 |
Daughter Mary Matilda is on the IGI: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 7 Nov 2008 02:12 |
Alternatively, it could mean that her page # was misread (or unreadable) - try looking at the entire rego district for marrs in that quarter. Probably best to just check Mary Ann's first, and see if they're the 5th name on a page, or their page isn't readable - check this against the image. |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 5 Nov 2008 23:54 |
maybe they liked getting wedding presents! |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 5 Nov 2008 23:52 |
They're also listed in the Jun qtr for that year too. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 5 Nov 2008 23:52 |
Just noticed something odd there appears to be two different index numbers for their wedding Greenwich 1d 560a 1st quarter and Greenwich 1d 773 2nd quarter |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 5 Nov 2008 23:41 |
I agree with Portland Rose that the bride is Phoebe looking at the images both William and Phoebes names are later additions to the list of names on the register. |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 5 Nov 2008 21:48 |
Think you will will need to get this birth cert: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Alison | Report | 5 Nov 2008 21:47 |
Could this be them ?? |
|||
|
judy | Report | 5 Nov 2008 21:22 |
Thank you all so much.It was greenwich but i am looking for Mary Ann on the 1861 census.They had Mary aged 1 year. |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 5 Nov 2008 21:08 |
I think it should be 560a which means he married Phoebe Hodgman. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 5 Nov 2008 21:03 |
Check the image and verify the page number is correct. Is it the one in Greenwich? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Alan | Report | 5 Nov 2008 20:56 |
What about 1861 Census, should be a clue there. |
|||
|
judy | Report | 5 Nov 2008 20:50 |
Von,Its 1858.William Lawrence.Theres no other name.was hoping for a Mary Ann. Jay |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 5 Nov 2008 20:24 |
Probably means that the other names haven't been transcribed yet. |
|||
|
judy | Report | 5 Nov 2008 20:21 |
Just found what could have been one of my great granfathers only to find he is the only one.No brides name.Usually 4 names two of each.Would that mean his brides name was unreadable?I am new to this.Jay |