Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 16:08 |
Yes feralcat the above people were elizabeth ethel roberts aunt and uncle who brought her up and kathryn b your census 1901 is her with them and i have now def ruled out all annie mcdougall nee brothers as eers father except thomas h roberts and can only find 2 candidates for mother died 1899 1stquarter margaret jane roberts age 25 liverpool or elizabeth ann roberts conway age 44 [findmypast]and i know she was irish from biography of family but the author only left me surnames mcdougall and roberts and eer.s cousins edward annie amy and edith[ as 1901 census]and"The criccieth welsh aunts"oh and the irish aunt katie whom the now deceased author[eer.s daughter] met in london during the 2nd world war.still cant do tidy writing sorry folks but hope this helps if not will wait til i get eer.sbirth cert.thanks vivienne.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 16:49 |
Vivienne -- the Thomas H Roberts, son of Evan, who was 17 in 1871 would have been born 1853-54 -- a little old to be the parent of a child born in 1899?
Is he this one?
Name: Thomas Hughes Roberts Year of Registration: 1853 Quarter of Registration: Jul-Aug-Sep District: St Asaph County: Denbighshire, Flintshire Volume: 11b Page: 326
If so, it looks like this marriage I copied above is his:
Marriages Dec 1874 BRADSHAW Elizabeth Helen W.Derby 8b 601 Cook John W. Derby 8b 601 LEWIS Mary Jane W. Derby 8b 601 Roberts Thomas Hughes W. Derby 8b 601
and they would be the people referred to by feralcat (I get what you were saying now, I think!):
"1881 Census Thomas H Roberts was living with his wife Elizabeth at 22 Dalkeith Street, Toxteth Park, Liverpool. Occupation, Joiner. Elizabeth was born in Denbighshire, Wales c1855."
... except that one says born in Liverpool -- which is what Thomas H, son of Evan, says in 1871.
Maybe this is the Thomas Hughes Roberts born in 1853:
Name: Thomas H. Roberts Age: 27 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1854 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Eliz. Helen Gender: Male Where born: Wales Civil Parish: Great Crosby County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address: 40 Murat St Condition as to marriage: Married Occupation: General Clerk In Wine & Spirit Trade Registration district: West Derby Sub-registration district: Crosby ED, institution, or vessel: 3
John H. Barker 21 Chas. E. Linacre 19 Eliz. Helen Roberts 29 Herbert G. Roberts 4 Thomas H. Roberts 27
I guess you know that the household with Thomas H Roberts, son of Evan, in 1871 is yours, because of the Ann Roberts Mcdougall connection ...
In any event, given how old he was, why would he not have been married loooong before 1899?
And I *still* don't know the answer to my very first question:
I can't find any Thomas Roberts marriage, last quarter, West Derby. Where did you get the info?
And yes, Vivienne, you can do tidy writing. All you do is hit the "enter" key twice when you get to the end of a thought. So your post would look like this, and would actually be comprehensible:
-------------------------------------------
Yes feralcat the above people were elizabeth ethel roberts aunt and uncle who brought her up
and kathryn b your census 1901 is her with them
and i have now def ruled out all annie mcdougall nee brothers as eers father except thomas h roberts
and can only find 2 candidates for mother died 1899 1stquarter
margaret jane roberts age 25 liverpool
or elizabeth ann roberts conway age 44 [findmypast]
and i know she was irish from biography of family but the author only left me surnames mcdougall and roberts
and eer.s cousins edward annie amy and edith[ as 1901 census]
and"The criccieth welsh aunts"
oh and the irish aunt katie whom the now deceased author[eer.s daughter] met in london during the 2nd world war.
still cant do tidy writing sorry folks but hope this helps if not will wait til i get eer.sbirth cert.
thanks vivienne.
----------------------------------------------
So if Elizabeth Ann Roberts was 44 when she died, she looks like a candidate to be the wife of Thomas H Roberts who would have been about 45 in 1899. But they could have married anytime ...
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 17:17 |
Do you actually know where your Thomas H Roberts was in 1891?
I think this might be him:
Name: Thomas H Y Roberts (Hy, =Henry, obviously) Age: 35 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1856 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Elizabeth A Gender: Male Where born: Liverpool, Lancashire, England
Occupation: Carpenter <<<
Name: Elizabeth A Roberts Age: 34 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1857 Relation: Wife Spouse's Name: Thomas H Y Gender: Female Where born: Ibstone, Oxfordshire, England (??) Civil Parish: Greenwich Ecclesiastical parish: Christchurch County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Greenwich Sub-registration district: Greenwich East ED, institution, or vessel: 17
Elizabeth A Roberts 34 Elizabeth A Roberts 7 Henry E Roberts 8 Herbert C Roberts 4 Thomas H Y Roberts 35 Thomas W Roberts 6 Walter F Roberts 2
The kids were all born after 1881, in Plumstead/Greenwich.
And they're all alive and well in 1901:
Elizth A Roberts 19 Elizth C Roberts 43 Henry E Roberts 18 Herbert C Roberts 14 Thomas H Roberts 43 Thomas W Roberts 16 Walter F Roberts 11
But you know, I really do think that is probably the Thomas H Roberts, son of Evan, in the 1871 household.
And so I think that your theory that the Thomas H Roberts, son of Evan, in the 1871 household, is the father of your EER is probably wrong.
If I'm right, this would likely be the birth of Thomas H Roberts, son of Evan:
Name: Thomas Henry Roberts Year of Registration: 1853 Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar District: Liverpool (1837-1934) County: Lancashire Volume: 8b Page: (have to check image for page number)
The discrepancy between the Thomas H in 1881 and the Thomas H in 1891 and 1901 is that, while both have wife Elizabeth, the 1881 Elizabeth was born c1855 in Denbyshire and the 1891/1901 Elizabeth was born c1857/8 in Oxfordshire. They could actually be two different people, two marriages.
Spend the dough. Get EER's birth certificate. We can take up a collection!
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 17:36 |
Eer was an only child
Thomas h was listed as joiner 1871 census
but in my bography he is described as..ships carpenter..so maybe he was on the high seas and married later when returned to dry land.
Have asked santa for eers cert, he says its in the post but any donations gratefully recieved as has all your input. thank you..vivienne
ps hope that was better!
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 18:07 |
elizabeth ethel roberts 16 03 1899 -- registered 2nd quarter:
Name: Elizabeth Ethel Roberts Year of Registration: 1899 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun District: West Derby County: Lancashire Volume: 8b Page: 507
Might her mother's death not also have been registered 2nd quarter?
Name: Ellen Roberts Estimated Birth Year: abt 1848 Year of Registration: 1899 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun Age at Death: 51 District: West Derby County: Lancashire Volume: 8b Page: 256
Name: Jane Roberts Estimated Birth Year: abt 1873 Year of Registration: 1899 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun Age at Death: 26 District: West Derby County: Lancashire Volume: 8b Page: 244
Name: Mary Roberts Estimated Birth Year: abt 1876 Year of Registration: 1899 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun Age at Death: 23 District: West Derby County: Lancashire Volume: 8b Page: 218
If you think your EER could be the one registered (late) in Conway, then
Name: Elizabeth Ann Roberts Estimated Birth Year: abt 1855 Year of Registration: 1899 Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar Age at Death: 44 District: Conway (To 1937) County: Caernarvonshire, Denbighshire Volume: 11b Page: 380
could be the right one -- she matches up with the 1881 wife of Thomas H in Liverpool, age-wise.
And you know, both those Elizabeths -- 1881 and 1891/1901, if they're different -- could have been wives of the same Thomas H, and still living -- he might simply have run off to London, leaving the first one behind, and hooked up with the second one.
Which would mean that the first one might be the mother of EER, but Thomas H would not have been her father.
She might have been this one in 1891, for example:
Name: Elizabeth Roberts Age: 38 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1853 Relation: Wife >>> no husband present Gender: Female Where born: Liverpool Civil Parish: Liverpool Ecclesiastical parish: St Bartholomew Town: Liverpool County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Liverpool Sub-registration district: Howard Street ED, institution, or vessel: 3
David Roberts 6 Edward Roberts 10 Elizabeth Roberts 38 Elizabeth Roberts 16 James Roberts 14 Mary Roberts 12 Richard Roberts 3/12 Robert Roberts 19 -- born just after 1881 census?
Those kids are split up in 1901:
Name: David Roberts Age: 14 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1887 Relation: Brother Gender: Male Where born: Liverpool, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Liverpool Ecclesiastical parish: St Albans County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: Liverpool Sub-registration district: St Martin ED, institution, or vessel: 22 Household schedule number: 340
Edward Roberts 20 Alice Roberts 20 - wife David Roberts 14
Name: Richard Roberts Age: 11 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1890 Relation: Visitor Gender: Male Where born: Liverpool, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: West Derby Ecclesiastical parish: St John the Baptist County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Registration district: West Derby Sub-registration district: West Derby, Eastern ED, institution, or vessel: 11 Household schedule number: 79
Robert Roberts 44 - visitor - probably father of children ... hmm ... Bertha Williams 23 Elizabeth Williams 6 months Richard Roberts 11 John Williams 24 John Williams 2
for example. Kinda like ... if their mother had died.
Do you suppose there's any chance that Elizabeth's *name* was Ireland, and not that she was *from* Ireland???
Marriages Dec 1879 Emmes Susan West Derby 8b 685 Ireland Elizabeth W. Derby 8b 685 Roberts Robert West Derby 8b 685 Sullivan Thomas W. Derby 8b 685
In 1881:
Name: Robert Roberts Age: 35 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1846 Relation: Lodger Gender: Male Where born: Liverpool, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Liverpool County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address: 6 Liscard Buildings Condition as to marriage: Married <<< Occupation: Boiler Maker Registration district: Liverpool Sub-registration district: St Martin ED, institution, or vessel: 34
Ann Cunnah 60 Samuel Grimshaw 29 George Kindle 33 Richard Rankin 45 Sarah H. Riley 16 Robert Roberts 35
The Robert Roberts in 1901 is an engineer, marine ... but oh crap, he's recorded as married.
And heck, I wonder whether your EER's mother really died, or everybody just said she did ...
For one thing, she could just have been the child of an unmarried daughter or granddaughter of Evan Roberts.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 18:22 |
There you go! You can do it. ;)
Joiner = carpenter. Same thing.
Farmdale Road, Greenwich, where Thomas Hy Roberts was living in 1891 -- the one I was looking at up there -- is within a few blocks of the docks. They were still there in 1901, and in 1901 he's actually called "carpenter & joiner".
I'm convinced to a virtual certainty that he's Thomas H, son of Evan!!
|
|
feralcat
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 18:25 |
Hi Viv,
That's as plain as day! ;-)
Nice to see you've risen above the sarcasm and vitriol displayed in this thread.
Let's know how you get on with the Certificates when you receive them.
Cheers, feralcat
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 18:45 |
Well hello there, feralcat.
You might want to learn to read for comprehension a little better.
"Nice to see you've risen above the sarcasm and vitriol displayed in this thread."
What's been "displayed" in this thread is frustration -- on the part of someone doing her damnedest to help out the person with the puzzle. You were talking about me, right?
If you want to comment on a participant in a discussion rather than contribute to the discussion, maybe you could start your own thread.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 18:55 |
And how perhaps I eat my virtual certainty; in 1881:
Name: Thomas H. Roberts Age: 23 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1858 Relation: Son Father's Name: William G. Mother's Name: Catherine Gender: Male Where born: Liverpool, Lancashire, England Occupation: Ship Joiner <<<<
Name: William G. Roberts Age: 60 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1821 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Catherine Gender: Male Where born: Sheerness, Kent, England Condition as to marriage: Married Occupation: Ship Joiner & Modeler (Bidr) Street address: 3 Cambridge Ter Registration district: Woolwich Sub-registration district: Woolwich Dockyard ED, institution, or vessel: 5
William T. Jolly 48 Catherine Roberts 58 Thomas H. Roberts 23 William G. Roberts 60
Funny thing that there were two Thomas H Roberts-s born in Liverpool in the 1850s who were both ship's carpenters ... if there were ... ;)
|
|
feralcat
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 19:01 |
;-)
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 19:08 |
Catherine in that 1881 household wasn't the mother of that Thomas Henry Roberts:
Name: Thomas Henry Roberts Age: 13 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1858 Relation: Son Father's Name: William George Mother's Name: Henrietta Gender: Male Where born: Liverpool, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Barking Ecclesiastical parish: St Margaret Town: Barking County/Island: Essex Country: England Registration district: Romford Sub-registration district: Barking Town ED, institution, or vessel: 1 Household schedule number: 5
Samuel Cock 18 Alice Charlotte Roberts 7 Arthur George Roberts 9 Henrietta Roberts 42 John James Roberts 17 Thomas Henry Roberts 13 William George Roberts 51 William Timothy Roberts 20
And every single other one of those Roberts-s was born in Kent.
The household in 1871 in Gravesend:
Amelia M Roberts 9 Emma A Roberts 18 Henrietta Roberts 33 Henrietta E Roberts 12 John Jas Roberts 7 Susette E Roberts 4 Thos H Roberts 3 William G Roberts 41 William T Roberts 10
and even the 4-yr-old was born in Kent.
Thomas Henry Roberts 1857 Oct-Nov-Dec West Derby Lancashire Thomas Henry Roberts 1858 Apr-May-Jun West Derby Lancashire
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 19:13 |
Feralcat:
http://genesreunited.co.uk/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=982749
about the 7th post.
S/he who speaks from ignorance makes fool of self. Now really, dear, if you want to continue this, I'm sure it would fit well on the chat board.
Or you could just read:
http://genesreunited.co.uk/genesreunited.asp?wci=grstatic&type=guidelines
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 19:20 |
Me thinks back to the drawing board when postie has delivered the info needed but i do think thomas h may have taken to the sea [again] as after eers mother died he disappeared after depositing eer with his sister and never saw her again!back when i get the all important paper.
on this one anyway.!!!
ta muchley. vivienne ps.. i love sarcasm it shapens the wits.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2007 20:20 |
Could I have something here? (Finally??? !!)
1891:
Name: Thomas H Roberts Age: 37 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1854 Relation: Son-in-law Gender: Male Where born: Liverpool, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Llansaintffraid Town: Llansantffraid Glyn Conway County/Island: Denbighshire Country: Wales
Condition as to marriage: Married Occupation: Joiner <<< Registration district: Conway <<< Sub-registration district: Creuddyn ED, institution, or vessel: 2
Ancestry seems to have invented a bunch of people and added them to the household -- the household actually consists only of:
Evan Roberts -- widower -- 85, born Caernarvon his daughter Mary Roberts -- single -- 27, born Denbighshire, "at home with her father" his son-in-law Thomas H Roberts -- married -- 37, born Liverpool
which doesn't make a lot of sense. But the name, DOB, occupation and father's name match the 1871 Thomas H.
(I see what Ancestry has done -- its usual trick of ignoring people's plainly written surnames, because it failed to read what appears to be Welsh for "head" in the next household, so has created a bunch of Roberts-s who are really named Hughes. And then included a Jones "wife" whose husband wasn't present that night and ignored her name too ... lordy ...)
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2007 18:10 |
irish auntie katie is ..catherine jennings.. in ww2 .when vi bombs are dropping on london [soho where she lived then and she worshipped at farm st church so must have died after war?]
she is eers mothers sister
only given the name today
her maiden name gives us eers mum ...come on folks make my christmas day i have searched since 10 am this morn . got no where.viv....still parky here..
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2007 18:41 |
Well that's ... heh heh ... a bombshell.
EER's mother was Elizabeth Jennings, you say?
Any chance she went by Mary?
Marriages Dec 1897 Cornett Sarah Jane Liverpool 8b 60 Galvin William Liverpool 8b 60 Jennings Mary Liverpool 8b 60 Roberts Thomas Liverpool 8b 60
Or they were in Tamworth district for some reason?
Marriages Dec 1880 JENNINGS Elizabeth Tamworth 6b 613 ROBERTS Thomas Tamworth 6b 613
Or - of course - they weren't married?
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2007 18:51 |
Had Elizabeth been married before??
Marriages Jun 1898 Bromsgrove John Toxteth Park 8b 400 Jones Mary Elizabeth Toxteth Park 8b 400 * Roberts Thomas Toxteth Park 8b 400 * Rycroft Elizabeth Toxteth Park 8b 400
Marriages Dec 1880 Clark Ann Hunslet 9b 423 * JENNINGS Thomas Hunslet 9b 423 LAMBERT Thomas Hunslet 9b 423 * Rycroft Jane Elizabeth Hunslet 9b 423
One theory ...
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2007 18:53 |
But are you not going to order the @$(*&@%^ birth certificate for EER?
I'm seriously not going to play much more unless you do.
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2007 18:57 |
No no no irish auntie
catherine jennings was eers mothers sister ,.. jennings was prob the the aunts married name...
viv
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2007 18:58 |
Nope. Looks like Elizabeth Rycroft Jennings was 44 in the 1891 census.
|