Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Anderson
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 21:34 |
Maybe Louisa got together with Charles the sailor or Charles the prisoner. Stranger things have happened. |
|||
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 21:31 |
That made me laugh! |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 21:31 |
I think you'll be stuck with theories. At least for now. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 21:29 |
Just when you thought Ancestry couldn't do anything stupider ... check out this list in 1871: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 21:26 |
Without a birth record I can't prove or disprove who Charles Anderson Juniors father was. As we only have the 3 certificates to go on, all of which say he is Charles Anderson do I just assume that he was a ompulsive liar and accept that I am unlikely to ever know the truth? |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 21:18 |
That's right -- unmarried Anderson woman = Anderson surname. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:59 |
if he were born to an unmarried Anderson woman wouldn't he have the last name Anderson? In which case there should be a birth record for him, unless he has changed his first name to Charles then the record would be ? Anderson I guess. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:56 |
Yeah, the two theories are actually mutually exclusive: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:52 |
Ruled out one George, died aged 6. |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:46 |
The 1861 prisoner -- there are 10 prisoners, all of them seamen in the merchant service. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:42 |
Interesting, but if he is busy serving time he may not have been visiting Essex lol |
|||
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:41 |
Found him. Nice candidate but if he is lying about his place of birth... |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:38 |
How do you like a misbehaving sailor for the job? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:34 |
The 1881 Charles Anderson's birth place appears to be a crock; there's nobody to match him in other censuses or the GRO births. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:31 |
Is there any sign of that Charles in the 1861?In theory he should have been in Essex if thats where Charles was born |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:26 |
Oh, you're here! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:23 |
And now for a completely different theory. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:20 |
Another starnge thing. if you look at Charles Anderson births Essex 1861+/- 5 you get 11 results (one of them a Frederick Charles), but if you search the 1871 census for Charles Andersons essex b same time frame you only get 2. Where are the others? Did they all die? |
|||
|
JayneB | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:12 |
Hi again Katherine, |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Jan 2008 20:00 |
No Charles / Charles George Anderson birth in Rochford reg district (Prittlewell) 1860-1865. |
|||
Researching: |