Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Help confirming an ancestor

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 5 Dec 2020 10:09

There was another brother

View London, England, Church of England Births and Baptisms, 1813-1917

Name: Charles Edward Bridgeman
Gender: Male
Record Type: Baptism
Baptism Date: 29 Dec 1892
Baptism Place: Earlsfield St Andrew, Wandsworth, England
Father: Edward Bridgeman occ plasterer
Mother: Amelia Sarah Bridgeman
Register Type: Parish Registers

Born 13.2.1892


BRIDGMAN, CHARLES EDWARD TAYLOR
GRO Reference: 1892 M Quarter in WEST HAM Volume 04A Page 152

Paul

Paul Report 5 Dec 2020 10:05

That 1888 George is the one that I think is the same as the 1921/1939 George. I have been able to trace quite a bit of information about the 1888 George, but feel I am lacking a smoking gun to say it is the say George as the 1921/1939 George.

The 1888 George was baptised in 1889 on which you can see his actual day of birth as 28/06/1888, exactly two years to the day different from 1921/1939 George.

The 1888 George is on the 1891 census with his parents, Edward and Amelia, living in West Ham (surname spelt Bridgeman on that one - common mistake).

By 1893 George is attending Garratt Lane School in Wandsworth. (Date of birth shows 28/06/1888 and father Edward).

Parents, Edward and Amelia had a daughter in 1891 Amelia Louise Bridgman who died aged 2 in 1893 in Wandsworth.

Then no sign of this 1888 George or his parents Edward and Amelia on he 1901 census. In fact I find no sign of Amelia or Edward again after that.

On the 1911 census there is a George Bridgman living in Carshalton on a farm with his uncles Charles and Thomas which are the correct ages and names of 1888 George's father Edward's brothers as evidenced by earlier census' when Edward was a child.

So far so good - I am pretty confident that all of the above up to 1911 is the 1888 George.

The link I have been uncomfortable declaring is that this 1888 George (and therefore the 1911 George) is my 1921/1939 Great Grandfather George.

The information I have on the 1921/1939 George is his wife, profession, date of birth, place of birth, children, date of death, name of father, place he was living in 1921 onwards...

Everything "fits" with the 1888 George but mostly circumstantially. Two key obstacles are the name of his father one his marriage certificate as "Edwin" not "Edward" and his date of birth as 28/06/1886 instead of 28/06/1888.

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 5 Dec 2020 10:02

George is with an uncle in 1901


View 1901 England Census
View blank form
Add or update information
Report a problem
Name: George Bridgeman
Age: 12
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1889
Relation to Head: Nephew
Gender: Male
Birth Place: London, England
Civil Parish: Hammersmith
Search Photos: Search for 'Hammersmith' in the UK City, Town and Village Photos collection
Ecclesiastical parish: St Mary Stamford Brook
County/Island: London
Country: England
Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status:

View image
Registration District: Fulham
Sub-registration District: North Hammersmith (including Starch Green)
ED, institution, or vessel: 02
Neighbors: View others on page
Piece: 39
Folio: 51
Page Number: 25
Household Schedule Number: 165
Household Members:
Name Age
Henry Bridgeman 45
Margaret Bridgeman 45
George Bridgeman 12



So maybe something happened to his parents so he may not have known the correct name for his father


Was the father given as deceased on the marriage cert ?

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 5 Dec 2020 09:57


The sisters death
Amelia Louisa Bridgman
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1891
Registration Year: 1893
Registration Quarter: Jan-Feb-Mar
Age at Death: 2
Registration District: Wandsworth
Parishes for this Registration District: View Ecclesiastical Parishes associated with this Registration District
Inferred County: London
Volume: 1d
Page: 40

ArgyllGran

ArgyllGran Report 5 Dec 2020 09:53

Welcome to the boards, Paul.

At first glance, without having done any research so far, I don't think the three inconsistencies you mention are necessarily deal-breakers.

YOB is frequently out by a year or two on the 1939 Register, but day and month are more often correct.

George 1888 does have a "k" if you look at the image of the Index, and is transcribed as such on FreeBMD and GRO sites.

Births Sep 1888 (>99%)
Bridgman George Frederick W. Ham 4a 124

The fathers' names of Edward or Edwin could easily be down to human error one way or the other - what the registrar wrote, or thought he heard.
I've come across several instances of someone being called Edward in some records and Edwin in others.

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 5 Dec 2020 09:53

Mistranscriptions all round
1891 census
George Medth Bridgeman
Gender: Male
Age: 2
Relationship: Son
Birth Year: 1889
Father: Edward Bridgeman
Mother: Amelia Bridgeman
Birth Place: Canning Town, London, England
Civil Parish: West Ham
Ecclesiastical parish: Holy Trinity
Residence Place: West Ham, West Ham, Essex, England
Registration District: West Ham
Sub registration district: West Ham
ED, Institution or Vessel: 24
Neighbors: View others on page
Piece: 1322
Folio: 30
Household Members:
Name Age
Edward Bridgeman 26. Occ plasterer
Amelia Bridgeman 24
George Medth Bridgeman 2
Anelia Louisa Bridgeman 7/12


It’s George Fred ,k on the census page

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 5 Dec 2020 09:49

Depends how people wanted to spell it !


George Frederic Bridgman
Gender: Male
Record Type: Baptism
Baptism Date: 24 Sep 1889
Baptism Place: London Docks St Peter, Tower Hamlets, England
Father: Edward Bridgman
Mother: Amelia Sarah Bridgman
Register Type: Parish Registers

Born 28.6.1888

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 5 Dec 2020 09:47

Again all in the same, area

Marriages Dec 1883 (>99%)
BRIDGMAN Edward Poplar 1c 1178
TAYLOR Amelia Sarah Poplar 1c 1178

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 5 Dec 2020 09:45

There’s no 1886 birth registration ,but there is this one

BRIDGMAN, GEORGE FREDERICK TAYLOR
GRO Reference: 1888 S Quarter in WEST HAM Volume 04A Page 124

And marrying Wandsworth would be in the same area

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it

Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it Report 5 Dec 2020 09:40

Have you found George on any census from 1911 backwards

Paul

Paul Report 5 Dec 2020 09:05

I am trying to trace my Great Grandfather, George Frederick Bridgman. I know that he married Margaret Macaulay on 26th February 1921 in Wandsworth. In the 1939 census he gives his date of birth as 28th June 1886. This date of birth also then appears on his death record in 1980 in Dacorum. On his marriage certificate his age is given as 35 which is also consistent with an 1886 year of birth.
The problem is I can find no record of a George Frederick Bridgman born in 1886, whereas there is a George Frederic Bridgman born on 28th June 1888, same day and month but wrong year. Is this 1888 George Frederic Bridgman the same George Frederick Bridgman that married Margaret Macaulay in 1921 and maybe lied about his year of birth one the 1939 census?
Another inconsistency between the two George's is that the 1888 George has a father named Edward and the 1921 George has a name of Edwin as his father on the marriage certificate.
Third inconsistency is that the 1888 George Frederic Bridgman has no 'k' on the end of his middle name.
But so much else seems to fall perfectly into place - place, profession, absence from the 1901 census etc.
Any help anyone can give would be much appreciated.
Regards
Paul Bridgman