Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Question for support team.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
mgnv | Report | 10 Jul 2020 22:16 |
From 1841 on, census day was a Sunday - technically, midnight of Sun/Mon night. |
|||
|
Dianna | Report | 10 Jul 2020 15:33 |
Thank you greyghost you confirm exactly what I was thinking. |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 9 Jul 2020 19:23 |
Always look at the original, not just the transcription. FMP transcript shows her as wife but original says Widow so will be the same on GR |
|||
|
Dianna | Report | 9 Jul 2020 18:52 |
Hi Erica. Thank you for your last note regarding the Elizabeth Davies/Williams saga. I was having difficulty identifying the name on the 1861 census. I have information on census reports prior to 1861 and after where Elizabeth is definately listed as Williams so it would appear that the person who made the entry on the census was wrong. |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 9 Jul 2020 18:48 |
From FMP with places of birth - Elizabeth & Mary reads Mothvey on the original and Elizabeth's r marital status is Widow not wife as transcribed. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 9 Jul 2020 18:38 |
The GR support team can’t alter what is on the image of a census taken 160 years ago. |
|||
|
Dianna | Report | 9 Jul 2020 17:13 |
Thank you ladies I can assure you l was not soliciting your help i was merely trying to contact the support team for their assistance, as it was addressed to them. i have always appreciated the help from members, i sensed there was a little attitude in your first response, |
|||
|
Dianna | Report | 9 Jul 2020 17:13 |
Thank you ladies I can assure you l was not soliciting your help i was merely trying to contact the support team for their assistance, as it was addressed to them. i have always appreciated the help from members, i sensed there was a little attitude in your first response, |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 9 Jul 2020 16:58 |
The image has been transcribed accurately............................... |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 9 Jul 2020 16:51 |
Obviously not!! |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 9 Jul 2020 16:40 |
That’s a bit rude as the member seems to have joined in 2005 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 9 Jul 2020 16:30 |
PM received |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 9 Jul 2020 16:16 |
Have you looked at the actual census page |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 9 Jul 2020 16:04 |
The support team do not look at the message boards |
|||
|
Dianna | Report | 9 Jul 2020 15:27 |
On the 1861 census household record it reports the following. |