Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1851 census proving if random coincidence???
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Tawny | Report | 21 Aug 2019 11:54 |
On the 1851 census my 4x great grandfather John Nicholas (1816??) is at home in hamlet of Escalls in the parish of Sennen in Cornwall. Living with John are his wife Elizabeth Chappell (1815) and four of their children including my 3x great grandfather Elijah who is 5 months old. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Tawny | Report | 21 Aug 2019 12:08 |
I have John and Elizabeth's marriage as May 12th 1842 and Elizabeth's christening as November 5th 1815. I'm waiting on their marriage certificate to confirm. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 21 Aug 2019 12:13 |
Esther and Nicholas had a son John - but born c1829 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Tawny | Report | 21 Aug 2019 12:19 |
Thank you ArgyllGran. It looks like it’s most likely coincidence then as Matthew and Ester’s son would be too young to be my 4x great grandfather. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Tawny | Report | 21 Aug 2019 12:54 |
Taking into account what Erika found it is possible that John and Henery on the 1841 census with Matthew and Esther could possibly be nephews or grandchildren as there is a very big gap between Henery and John and the next potential youngest child this would potentially mean that my John could still be their son. “Helpfully” the 1841 census doesn’t give familial relationships. I think I need to do some digging. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 21 Aug 2019 12:59 |
Matthew Nicholas |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 21 Aug 2019 13:18 |
SEE ABOVE BUT DIFFERENT SPELLING |
|||
|
Tawny | Report | 21 Aug 2019 13:38 |
Thank you Maddie that would explain why I couldn’t find John’s christening. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 21 Aug 2019 13:47 |
On the 1851 census there is also an Elizabeth Nicholas and a Grace Nicholas, living on the other side of John Nicholas. They are two spinsters who are quite likely to be Matthew's sisters - although this would need checking. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 21 Aug 2019 13:53 |
Strange that the marriage gives John's father as Michael, as this is the only baptism I can see at the right time for John in Sennen, Cornwall:- |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 21 Aug 2019 13:55 |
I doubt the surnames are coincidental - more likely to be wider family if they are not parents. |
|||
|
Tawny | Report | 21 Aug 2019 14:10 |
Thank you Kath. Maddie’s christening may well be correct as the names were spelled phonetically then and they would just have written down what they thought they heard. It is also possible the family moved for work. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 21 Aug 2019 14:32 |
Yes, seems like the baptism found by Maddie is the correct one as father's name matches with father's name on the marriage record. |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 22 Aug 2019 07:18 |
Marriage reference... |
|||
|
Tawny | Report | 22 Aug 2019 08:52 |
Thank you for the marriage record Chris and thank you for my 3x great grandfathers christening. |
|||
Researching: |