Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Peter Kelly and Margaret Allison
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Janet | Report | 9 Feb 2019 11:16 |
AustinQ, how on earth do you find all these treasures? You are a wonder!!! Thank you so much for the time you are putting into this. |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 9 Feb 2019 12:13 |
Can't see the marriage yet, but it would be parish register rather than civil registration. Just looking at the ages of Peter and Bridget- I suspect either their ages are slightly out or their son Peter was born earlier than c1865 (or perhaps he was an illegitimate so of one of the daughters?). Need to look into this a bit more |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 9 Feb 2019 12:55 |
From the marriages both Mary Kerr and Margaret Kerr give their father as Patrick, a farmer. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 9 Feb 2019 13:55 |
42 when Owen was born, 48 for Peter - perhaps they are the youngest of a very large brood! |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 9 Feb 2019 13:59 |
Just backtracking slightly, but wanted to post before I forget: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 9 Feb 2019 14:45 |
And just to confirm, the possible death I posted earlier for Margaret's sister Elizabeth (Bridget) Kelly is correct: |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 9 Feb 2019 14:48 |
I wonder if this could be Peter : |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 9 Feb 2019 15:21 |
Elizabeth B Davies (nee Kelly) in 1965. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 9 Feb 2019 17:35 |
I think to progress with Margaret Ellison/ Allison you'll need the marriage certificate. I'm not convinced that Margaret was born in the US. There was a large Ellison family living in and around Ballynahaye- despite marrying in Lanchester I wonder if she was also from Ireland. |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 9 Feb 2019 17:57 |
Anne is willing to buy any certificates necessary - would the marriage certificate show where she was born though? Or would the clue be in her father's details? |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 9 Feb 2019 18:00 |
It would tell you her father's name (assuming she knew it) and occupation, and whether he was alive or deceased. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 9 Feb 2019 18:09 |
Thank you so much for the time you are putting into this, Anne is very grateful to you. I hope you are finding it as intriguing as I am. |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 9 Feb 2019 18:34 |
Certificate ordered, now to wait another week. |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 9 Feb 2019 18:57 |
????? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 9 Feb 2019 19:00 |
Census Years1901TyroneAghnahoeBallynahayeResidents of a house |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 9 Feb 2019 19:22 |
So if the Dungannon Margaret Ellison is the right one, the Durham one probably isn't, as the 1901 said she was born in USA. Unless that's just an error on the part of the census taker, which has been known to happen. |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 9 Feb 2019 20:14 |
Best wait for the marriage certificate to confirm her father's name and occupation. I do think the Durham family is the correct one. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Janet | Report | 9 Feb 2019 22:23 |
Neither of the Margaret Kellys born in CoDurham between 1899 and 1901 has mother with maiden name of Allison or Ellison |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 10 Feb 2019 08:31 |
Hard to tell whether Margaret is 1 year or 1 month on the 1901 census, but either way I can't see a registration for her birth. The family were in Ireland by Feb 1903 to register their daughter Elizabeth. Perhaps they moved to Ireland shortly after the census and simply forgot? Annoying we can't find it . |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 10 Feb 2019 09:13 |
It does appear that Peter returned to Ireland very shortly after the 1901 census. I think this article in September 1901 refers to him. He was listed as a grocer on Elizabeth's birth (Feb 1903), a business that apparently didn't last long as on the births of later children he is again listed as a labourer: |