Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Re James Burns b 1898, d 1901 Fylingdales
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Heather | Report | 17 Nov 2018 11:23 |
Trying to find a burial place for James Burns (aged just 3) son of Hannah and Thomas Burns, Raw, Fylingdales. |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 17 Nov 2018 11:40 |
James |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 17 Nov 2018 12:04 |
This family on the 1911 census seems to match. Residence is Raw, Robin Hood's Bay but Hannah says married 31 years, 3 children born, all still living. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 17 Nov 2018 12:08 |
JAMES |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 17 Nov 2018 12:17 |
1901 census, same address: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 17 Nov 2018 12:38 |
1891 census. Why did she say in 1911 that she'd only had 3 children? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 17 Nov 2018 12:39 |
The burial that Maddie found seems to be the right one. |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 17 Nov 2018 12:44 |
So, he's a widower in 1881 and Hannah is his housekeeper. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 17 Nov 2018 12:48 |
Perhaps Hannah didn't understand the question being asked on the 1911 census form and just meant that there were only 3 children living at home. ??? |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 17 Nov 2018 15:34 |
Yes, I think the question was misunderstood regarding the number of children. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 17 Nov 2018 15:45 |
Lots of people had no headstone in those days. There is also the possibility that James was buried with an adult who was being buried at the same time - another thing that happened quite often with young children. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 17 Nov 2018 16:03 |
I have just looked at the image of the burial record again and in the margin next to some of the burials are the letters NG followed by a number (the numbers are in sequence) although this is NOT next to James's entry. I just wondered if these numbers were plots that had a headstone or if it meant something else. |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 22 Nov 2018 14:29 |
I have been able to confirm that James Burns was both baptised on 6/2/1898 and buried on 5/5/1901 at New St Stephens Church Fylingdales (Fylingthorpe), yet it appears there is neither a record of a plot number/record of burial position in the graveyard and no gravestone and the current Vicar stated the following! |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 22 Nov 2018 14:43 |
Infants were frequently buried with unrelated adults whose funerals were 'next in line' in the undertaker's premises. |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 22 Nov 2018 14:44 |
sounds like another brick wall im afraid |