Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Mary Ann Edwards, Liverpool.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 22 Jun 2018 14:12 |
In which case - young Ruth's birth: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 22 Jun 2018 14:30 |
Marriages Sep 1859 (>99%) |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 22 Jun 2018 14:32 |
Thomas is a widower in 1891, but I don't see Ruth's death, at least not in Lancashire. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 22 Jun 2018 14:34 |
1861 |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 22 Jun 2018 14:48 |
The Thomas Edwards at sea in 1901, posted by Catherine, I suspect is the one we looked at initially, married to Margaret. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 22 Jun 2018 17:20 |
So grateful for all this help. To answer Dea's Question: Witnesses at wedding Thomas Johnson and Mary Watts. My sister and I have been looking into the Dietman/Farmer connection but as yet cannot link Martha to Mary. The Sarah Jane Ruth Edwards we also agree with. Sarah is a name used by Mary Ann for one of her children. Marys Anns daughter Frances (my grandmother) also named one of her children Ruth, so could tie in. I was hoping there was some sort of Seamans book that would have details of family in it, but other than vessels and their crews haven't found any information (except for David Fernie). We had starting putting in some of these details into our tree a few months back, but then stopped as we didn't want to go down the wrong track, I think the Graves family tree has taken that info which we have since deleted. Once again thanks everyone will keep on researching. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 22 Jun 2018 18:20 |
Re the "cousin" question in 1881 and 1891 - |
|||
Researching: |