Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Hurst/Hirst in Rishton lancashire
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Dea | Report | 4 Jun 2015 08:37 |
???? |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 3 Jun 2015 19:50 |
Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1867 |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 3 Jun 2015 09:31 |
As her father's name was not recorded, and he was 'deceased', you will probably have to accept that she didn't know who he was. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 2 Jun 2015 23:12 |
Kicking myself...........forgot to tick the 'phonetic surname search'. :-( |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 2 Jun 2015 22:40 |
Yes...married Agnes fairburne/fairburne in 1867 in Burnley. |
|||
|
Sylvia | Report | 2 Jun 2015 22:15 |
THOMAS This one? |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 2 Jun 2015 21:16 |
Thought I'd seen a wedding. It is down as Thomas duxberry and Agnes fairburne in 1867. Burnley. :-) |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 2 Jun 2015 21:13 |
They must not have married but she took his name anyway. Wonder why they never married. Strange. |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 2 Jun 2015 21:07 |
Lancashire Death indexes for the years: 1864 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 2 Jun 2015 21:06 |
Oh maybe Thomas and Agnes fell out because he was not living with her in 1881 . She died in December quarter did Agnes. Thanks for finding her in 1881 .....I didn't know s h e was living up there with the briggs. Cheers for that. :-) |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 2 Jun 2015 21:05 |
1861 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 2 Jun 2015 21:03 |
There is NO record of a marriage to Agnes as far as I can see |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 2 Jun 2015 21:01 |
1881 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 2 Jun 2015 21:00 |
Just checked...Agnes died 1881 so perhaps that's why he went to live with either son or daughter Jane. |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 2 Jun 2015 20:58 |
Yes..Thomas had second marriage to Agnes. But think then it was 1881 when he was living over towards Pendle. I think it was with one of his sons. But he actually died in Burnley where he was living with another of his sons. Think Agnes had recently died but not sure. |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 2 Jun 2015 20:53 |
Think betty was born out of wedlock I seem to remember. Not certain if Thomas was dad or not. |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 2 Jun 2015 20:53 |
Burial: 29 Sep 1866 Burnley Cemetery, Burnley, Lancashire, England |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
malyon | Report | 2 Jun 2015 20:52 |
if she had a son james then that might be ann's birth i posted her father was james mother ellen |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 2 Jun 2015 20:50 |
1871 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 2 Jun 2015 20:47 |
Think Ann died in Burnley in 1866, think Thomas was living towards colne with son maybe james or Richard ...think james on the 1871. If that's correct Ann it makes her born around 1815 as it says she was 48. |