Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Missing Family 1901 Census - Morgans from Salford
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Clive | Report | 8 Jan 2015 13:26 |
Potty - Sarah's details tie in with what I have. She married a Mr Smith and then a Mr Marshall. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:57 |
Sister Sarah in 1911: |
|||
|
Clive | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:39 |
Jacqueline - I noticed I had a typo in my original post. Death of Mary is 1894 (not 81) which is why I assume Thomas is born (1892) to Mary. |
|||
|
Clive | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:23 |
Potty - yes that is his name Thomas Henry. Marriage cert 1916 at Charlestown. |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:22 |
Well, the groom's occupation certainly matches the 1911 census, so that would appear to be the right family, but where they were in 1901 is anyone's guess. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:16 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:15 |
Thomas had a middle name: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:11 |
Does he name his father as Thomas on his marriage cert? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:10 |
Where did Thomas b 1892 come from? Too young to be on the 1891 so what makes you think the 1911 census is for the same family? |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:10 |
?????????? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:09 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Clive | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:07 |
:-D :-S |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 8 Jan 2015 12:02 |
I can't find any of the 1911 family in 1901; can't find birth records for Florrie and Rose (have looked under Pat* as well as Morgan) and can't find a Mary Ellen Paton either! |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 8 Jan 2015 11:59 |
1891 for INFO |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 8 Jan 2015 11:57 |
No, I'm saying the woman in 1911 probably wasn't his wife |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Clive | Report | 8 Jan 2015 11:56 |
The problem I have is that I can't find the 1891 family in 1901. If I could access that census record it would help decide whether the 1911 details are the same people/family. |
|||
|
Clive | Report | 8 Jan 2015 11:53 |
ok, so the 1911 people aren't the same as the 1891 people, is that what you are thinking? |
|||
|
Jacqueline | Report | 8 Jan 2015 11:52 |
So they lied? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Clive | Report | 8 Jan 2015 11:51 |
Thanks but.. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 8 Jan 2015 11:51 |
On the 1911 census it says Mary Ellen had 4 children, two of which had died so Rosie and Martin must be her children. |