Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
UPDATE George Edward Bryant born 5 Oct 1863 Kent
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Andrew | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:51 |
For ref. Youngest child from 1901 |
|||
|
Kathryn | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:51 |
Hi Andrew and Prickly Holly, was busy typing my last post and noted you have added to the thread. Excellent on the 1901 Census. Yet again there is a discrepancy as George is shown as being born 1865. Why couldn't they get facts right way back then. These things are sent to try us. And look how they've spelt George's surname. |
|||
|
Kathryn | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:47 |
Well done, it always, well in my case takes another pair of eyes. I have just checked for the marriage of George and Emily and they were married on 22 June 1886. Her name is Emily Jane Bradley, her father being William. The witnesses were Joseph H West and Charlotte Margaret West. Against George's name no father is given. This whole thing has thrown me completely as George's middle name is given differently on several occasions albeit I believe he is one in the same George born 1863 although of course I am by no means an expert at this research. Not sure if it is possible to trace George Snr by his previous children George James and William John. Hope I'm not confusing the whole thing too much and jumping from one thing to another. |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:47 |
Well done Andrew!!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:43 |
Here is 1901 |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:38 |
Picking apart 1911 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kathryn | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:34 |
Hi, I will look to see if I can see the marriage of George and Emily on CityArk. Although the image on the 1881 Census does say F am 100% sure this is the same George Snr. |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:29 |
Argghh!!!! Sorry - the image for 1881 is ...........F............. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:27 |
Might this be the marriage between a George John Bryant and Emily? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kathryn | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:24 |
Hi, am 100% confident that Sarah Packman is George's paternal grandmother. She was a widow when she married George Packman. Am glad the 1881 Census image has been cleared up that it is George E. I think I found the marriage for Sarah to George Packman on CityArk as well. |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:17 |
I'm not having any luck with the 1901 census. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 18 Apr 2014 11:13 |
The image for 1881 definitely says George E |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kathryn | Report | 18 Apr 2014 10:42 |
Good morning, still trying to locate some of my ancestors. Firstly, I have this family in my tree on Ancestry although some of the information regarding George Snr may not be correct, at the moment I am only surmising the information contained within his profile. |