Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help finding Alexander Lawson, 1801
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 26 Jun 2013 19:53 |
This is odd, Mike posted the 1870 census that showed Alexander and Mary A with the Smiths. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 26 Jun 2013 20:01 |
Shame there wasn't more info on this to say which one he was: |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 26 Jun 2013 20:03 |
I have the 1870 census Mike posted, as well. There are a couple of weird things on this. First, this is the first time I've seen the "R" in the elder's name. It's usually in Alex Jr.'s name. Secondly, his "R" is not there. The duplicate of what appears to be Alex and Mary might be accounted for by the parents visiting married Smiths on one day, and at home on another, IF the enumeration was actually done on two separate days. Another way of accounting for it could be that 1302 N. Front St was the boot-making store, and they were counted there, and then counted again in their home, later that night, with the Smiths. That would account for duplication. It would be wrong, of course, lol, but it could account for it. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 26 Jun 2013 20:13 |
MarieCeleste - the Declaration of Intent you posted - it seems to me this must have been done while Alex Sr. was IN the USA, not from Ireland, in order for it to be a specific PA court. It has to be Alex Sr, since Jr. was not born at the time of the Declaration. Since the rest of the family did not immigrate until 1847, that would seem to indicate that if he arrived 1818 on the Lancaster, he went back and forth a bit. The children were born, ostensibly in Ireland, while he was in the USA, otherwise. And that just won't do. :) I would have thought the back-and-forth would be cost-prohibitive. How very odd. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 26 Jun 2013 20:18 |
Helen, that's what makes me think that there was more than one of that name - I agree that the idea of him commuting across the Atlantic seems infeasible. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 26 Jun 2013 20:27 |
I mentioned that on some of the city directories there's also an Alexander Lawson who was a weaver. Found this: |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 26 Jun 2013 20:48 |
I agree, it is conjecture. A comfortable one, in terms of the Declaration, to be sure :) Especially since weaver arrived 1830, and the declaration is 1832. This makes more sense than commuting boot-makers. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 27 Jun 2013 15:46 |
I'm still struggling with how to find records of Alexander Lawson b 1801, in Ireland. Ship records indicate the family coming to Philadelphia in 1847, but I cannot find them as a group in Ireland, so that I can connect them. Any thoughts on this? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 27 Jun 2013 17:51 |
Helen, |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 27 Jun 2013 23:32 |
Thanks, Potty. While they could very well be related to my bunch, I don't see the connection at this point. I'm really not sure what to try next. I was thinking to try to find counties with clusters of Lawsons, then trying the church records in those areas. Does that seem realistic? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 28 Jun 2013 14:45 |
This is the website for the Irish 1901/1911 censuses, it's a free: |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 28 Jun 2013 18:12 |
Thanks Potty. Much appreciated :) |
|||
Researching: |