Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
big brick wall needs knocking down
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Tracy | Report | 18 Jun 2013 18:35 |
I know what you mean flip looks like a trip to ro coming up |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 17:35 |
I'm not altogether convinced by that tree on ancestry or the change of name. The tree shows lots of info, but not backed up by any evidence - a simple trip to the RO would get a lot of the info from parish records and may relate to more than one family. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Tracy | Report | 18 Jun 2013 14:22 |
thanks chris had a quick look on ancestry on that tree that is mentioned above why the change of name lol |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 18 Jun 2013 14:01 |
Births Sep 1900 (>99%) |
|||
|
Tracy | Report | 18 Jun 2013 13:56 |
hello to all helping me sorry not been online poorly child now sleeping thank god the marriage was sept 12 1899 in wotton under edge Gloucester his age is 27 |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 13:07 |
Just to throw a spanner in the works, and cast some more doubt: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 11:54 |
This may be him, his younger sister appears to be with her aunt/uncle |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 11:49 |
Looks likely for their deaths, but I wonder why he married as Charles?? Seems a bit odd. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 18 Jun 2013 11:40 |
(wonder if below then?) |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 11:22 |
A public member tree on Ancestry has no documentation, but very precise on dates. It says Henry James Harvey was born 6/6/1872, Wandsworth. Married Edith 12/9/1999 and has all their children's details. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 10:40 |
Interesting link Chris, I'm sure I looked at that family earlier. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 10:30 |
IF (a big IF) the ages are accurate, we could try to narrow down the birth quarter - what exact date was the marriage please? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 18 Jun 2013 10:19 |
Marriages Sep 1899 (>99%) |
|||
|
Tracy | Report | 18 Jun 2013 10:01 |
he married 1899 gonna have to send of for child birth to see xx |
|||
|
Tracy | Report | 18 Jun 2013 09:59 |
hi all just comeback from work right there is no deceased listed on marriage cert for fathers his age is 27 |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 09:53 |
Also, from the marriage certificate are either of their fathers stated "deceased" - I see Edith's father died in 1894, followed by her mother in 1900. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 09:21 |
Just had a look at the Charles from Chatham Kent. He has a RN record on national archives, and was with his parents on 1901 census in Chatham. The image has the work category added afterwards as well, but it says Men. This has been inserted after Royal Navy and before Stoker. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 08:47 |
Hi Chris, I'm not sure - it's been written afterwards against a number of the people who have stated RN. Looking at the census images in that collection there are a lot of RN who have this written on afterwards - think it could be something to do with the category of worker. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 18 Jun 2013 08:36 |
Looking at 1901 image, is that Mer, written by side of Navy?...(Merchant) |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 18 Jun 2013 07:59 |
You say he was a seaman, but on the 1901 census it shows he was in the royal navy, so there should be a service record on national archives. |
|||
Researching: |