Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
help needed im stuck :-(
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Flip | Report | 22 Apr 2013 16:44 |
Maybe dad wanted a Harriet, but mother registered her as Jane - or visa versa. Who knows what went through our ancestors thoughts (without the crystal ball). But I can't see any other explanation. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 22 Apr 2013 12:04 |
I think you are right Flip. The birth looks like Jane, if that is so it seems rather odd for her parents to call her Harriet! But there is no other explanation as far as I can see. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Apr 2013 05:59 |
Has anyone had a better look at Harriet? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Vicci | Report | 22 Apr 2013 01:41 |
Name: Jane Cumberland |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lisa | Report | 22 Apr 2013 01:06 |
ok i guess thats the way to go now |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 22 Apr 2013 01:03 |
I totally agree with you - what a mystery! The only other thing I can suggest is to risk getting that birth cert just to be sure. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lisa | Report | 22 Apr 2013 01:01 |
its getting a little clearer... but jane still nowhere to be found! |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:52 |
Just putting this as Mary looks to be Jemima's sister: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:50 |
William and Jemima must be right. Just bear with me! I think William married Jemima Marcer . On checking out the person below, I am fairly sure she was Mary Marcer before marriage. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lisa | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:44 |
is it possible that harriet cumberland 1858 could have been harriet jane or even just used jane instead? |
|||
|
Lisa | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:29 |
it was couple called higginbottom wiitnesses |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:24 |
Well, this is William and jemima - but as I say no Jane. Please can you answer above queries - i.e. address and witnesses on marriage cert. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lisa | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:21 |
yes ive come arcoss william and jemima defo no jane! |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:20 |
odd - looking at the family tree on familysearch.org - William's mother is Fanny :-S |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:16 |
well now you have her parents and some of her siblings |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lisa | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:14 |
all i have is that her dad william cumberland was what looks to be a sawyer in 1883! |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:14 |
Also been looking at William and Jemima |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:12 |
Yes she did Anne, it's just that i thought Lisa just wanted her before marriage. That's all! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:10 |
I have found William and Jemima but no Jane with them. William is a sawyer if that helps. They are on census 1851 onwards so no question that Jemima re-married after Jane was born. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 22 Apr 2013 00:10 |
well didn't she become Jane Shorrocks? and could Mary be a daughter of hers? |
|||
Researching: |