Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
First wife please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
PatinCyprus | Report | 26 Apr 2013 07:48 |
Thanks Thelma for letting us know, it backs up what we found.. :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 25 Apr 2013 17:56 |
Now have birth cert. for Mary Jane Hack 27/10/1858 11 King St.Southampton. |
|||
|
PatinCyprus | Report | 16 Apr 2013 17:30 |
There could have been a quiet wedding on the Friday. The Christening was on the Sunday, all the Christening I've been to were Sundays. The dates of birth on the Christening ties up with a last quater 1862 registration of the birth. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 16 Apr 2013 16:43 |
PatinCyprus |
|||
|
PatinCyprus | Report | 16 Apr 2013 14:20 |
Is this the answer John waited for a son??? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PatinCyprus | Report | 16 Apr 2013 14:10 |
Mike the census in 1861 states the girls are named Mary and Sarah Hack and the births are registered as Hacks. John Hack is claiming them and says he's a widower whilst Elizabeth is still a Taylor and says she's married, no claim on the girls at this time. This only happens at their Christening when the surname isn't important. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 16 Apr 2013 13:57 |
Thank you safc. |
|||
|
safc | Report | 16 Apr 2013 12:43 |
Name: Selina Hack |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 16 Apr 2013 12:42 |
Mgnv |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 16 Apr 2013 12:08 |
I cannot thank you all enough.You have found information that I could not. |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 16 Apr 2013 00:54 |
Mike - I think you're mistaken. The purpose of a christening is to give the child their christian name(s). It has nothing to do with surnames. The typical post-1810 baptismal register has a column headed "Child's Christian Name" and a double column headed "Parents Name" which is subdivided into "Christian" and "Surname" columns. So if the entry said "John illegitimate son of" "William Smith & Mary Brown", you're left to guess what his surname is - in truth you're always left to guess, but the guess his surname is the one used by both his parents is the usual guess, and nearly always correct. |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 16 Apr 2013 00:00 |
Although John is recorded as a widower on 1861 census, does the marriage cert in 1863 bear this out ? |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 15 Apr 2013 21:16 |
Not unheard of for stepparents to be named on christening records. |
|||
|
PatinCyprus | Report | 15 Apr 2013 18:30 |
Can't see a death for Sarah so perhaps they just put the wrong year as it's about right month, just should be 1860, perhaps miss transcribed. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PatinCyprus | Report | 15 Apr 2013 18:25 |
Looks like 1st Sarah died and this backs up other Christening information. Thanks Maddie. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 15 Apr 2013 18:20 |
nice one PatinCyprus :-) |
|||
|
PatinCyprus | Report | 15 Apr 2013 18:17 |
Perhaps one or two porkies told at the census, explains why there's no 1st marriage |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 15 Apr 2013 18:17 |
just wondering if he was telling porkies as he was living with Elizabeth in 1861 and youngest child only 7 months old, can't find a female Hack death for 1860/1861 |
|||
|
PatinCyprus | Report | 15 Apr 2013 18:03 |
parents:James Hack |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 15 Apr 2013 18:03 |
the marraige posted by jansmith |