Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 20:16 |
If this is the right Philip Palfrey, the 1901 census doesn't fit with the 1883 marriage posted:
PALFREY, Phillip Head Married M 50 1851 General Labourer Canada PALFREY, Sarah Ann Wife Married F 39 1862 Plymouth, Devonshire PALFREY, Albert Son Single M 19 1882 General Labourer Bristol, Gloucestershire PALFREY, Richard Son Single M 15 1886 General Labourer Bristol, Gloucestershire PALFREY, Ernest Son Single M 12 1889 Bristol, Gloucestershire PALFREY, Lilly Daughter Single F 6 1895 Cardiff, Glamorganshire PALFREY, Ann Daughter Single F 5 1896 Cardiff, Glamorganshire PALFREY, Maud Daughter Single F 2 1899 Cardiff, Glamorganshire PALFREY, Maggie Daughter Single F 0 (UNDER 6 MOS)1901 Cardiff, Glamorganshire HARDING, Ann Boarder Single F 64 1837 Ireland Dublin
Piece: 4987 Folio: 46 Page: 83 Registration District: Cardiff Civil Parish: Canton
Address: 29, Lincoln Street, Canton County: Glamorganshire
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 20:24 |
This is the same family in 1911, but the birthplaces have gone to pot!
PALFREY, Phillip Head Married M 62 1849 General Labourer Almouth (Plymouth ??) PALFREY, Sarah Wife Married 23 years F 45 1866 PALFREY, Albert Son Singel M 28 1883 General Labourer City Cardiff PALFREY, Lilley Daughter Singel F 17 1894 City Cardiff PALFREY, Amor Daughter Singel F 16 1895 City Cardiff PALFREY, Maud Daughter Singel F 10 1901 City Cardiff PALFREY, Madge Daughter Singel F 10 1901
RG number: RG14 Piece: 32149 Reference: RG14PN32149 RG78PN1847 RD588 SD4 ED17 SN370 Registration District: Cardiff Sub District: West Cardiff Enumeration District: 17 Parish: Cardiff
Address: 29 Lincoln ST County: Glamorganshire
** Sarah's birthplace on original is Bristol. Daughter "Amor" will be Ann.
They'd had 12 children, 9 still alive.
|
|
Julia
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 20:35 |
Hi MarieCeleste, Thank you for the update on the Army Career of Patrick, he seems to have been a colourful character! and thank you AnnCardiff for the marriage record. all the best, Julia.
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 20:37 |
On the 1891 Philip is showing as single, and is a lodger:
1891 England Census
Name: Phillip Palfrey Age: 40 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1851 Relation: Boarder Gender: Male Where born: Upper, Canada Civil parish: St Michael Ecclesiastical parish: St Michael Town: Bristol County/Island: Gloucestershire Country: England Street Address: Park Row Lodge Occupation: Condition as to marriage: Single Education: Employment status:
Registration district: Bristol Sub-registration district: St Augustine ED, institution, or vessel: 5 Neighbors: View others on page Piece: 1964 Folio: 90 Page Number: 5
Household Members: Name Age John Pearl 40 Sarah A Pearl 28 Albert Pearl 10 Richard Pearl 5 Frank Pearl 3 Ernest Pearl 1 Phillip Palfrey 40
I reckon Sarah A is who he's with on the later census, as are Albert & Richard. Their ages and birthplaces all tie in.
|
|
Julia
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 20:49 |
Hi MarieCeleste, This looks like the right family although the wife is not one of the names I had, I see Richard Palfrey is listed as one of the children which is the one I am interested in. I am almost certain this is correct. Maybe Phillip married twice? The 1911 census is a bit of a jumble, I think maybe Plymouth has been written on the wrong line. It is definitely the same family isn't it. (married 23 years in 1911, marriage year 1898, the marriage date I had was 1883 Ipswich, I think I have that wrong or this was the first marriage). Thank you Julia.
|
|
Julia
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 20:54 |
Hi MarieCeleste, The marriage of 1883 must be wrong, Thank you. Julia.
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 20:57 |
Julia, I think Philip may have put Plymouth as his birthplace as that is where he grew up (often happens).
My guess is that he and Sarah Ann never actually married. There's no record of it.
It's odd that Philip is shown as single on the 1891 - perhaps he tried it and didn't like it! Only way to be sure is to buy a copy of that 1883 certificate.
I'm guessing that the P in Richard P Palfrey may well have stood for Pearl.
|
|
Julia
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 21:07 |
Hi MarieCeleste, I think you are right, maybe never married and so recorded as single. Sarah maybe lived with her parents until she had so many chilodren that Phillip was taken to one side and told to find them somewhere to live! Thank you for all your work on this family, Julia.
|
|
Julia
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 21:14 |
Hi MarieCeleste, Yes I agree, Richard P will be Richard Pearl, all falls into place! You have unravelled a mystery, this is fantastic! Thanks so much. Julia.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 21:56 |
There does seem to be only one Philip Palfrey showing on the censuses.
My suggestion would be that that IS his marriage in 1883, but that the marriage broke down, and he took up with Sarah Ann Pearl.
Divorces were almost impossible for the ordinary person to get in those days ................. so he and Sarah would be unable to marry until after his first wife died
and maybe she did not before he himself died ............... or maybe he and Sarah were not bothered, as everyone would assume they were married.
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 22:01 |
even though only one Phil* Palfrey b. 1851 +/- 2 showed up .......... there is this one.
AND this one is married to an Alice
AND they live in Ipswich!
1891 Census
Name: Phillip Palfrey Age: 28 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1863 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Alice Palfrey Gender: Male Where born: Rougham, Suffolk, England Civil parish: St Peter Ecclesiastical parish: St Peter Town: Ipswich County/Island: Suffolk Country: England Registration district: Ipswich Sub-registration district: Ipswich Western
Phillip Palfrey 28 Butcher Alice Palfrey 30 Alfred S Capon 17 Boarder, Butcher's Apprentice
so I think this Philip is the one for whom you found the marriage registration
and maybe your Philip just had an aversion to marriage!!
sylvia
|
|
Julia
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 22:28 |
Hi Sylvia, Thank you very much, another mystery solved! It is looking likely that Phillip I am researching never married. Regards, Julia.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 22:31 |
Julia
Do NOT assume that the Pearl children are Philip Palfrey's!
If you look at the image of the 1891 Census, the name is actually Peard ............ and someone has made corrections to the ancestry version to that effect.
Here is a probable marriage for John Peard and Sarah Ann in 1879
Marriages Jun 1879 (>99%) LONG Sarah Ann Bristol 6a 1 PEARD John George Bristol 6a 1
Baptism of Albert Peard
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Albert Francis Peard
Name: Albert Francis Peard Gender: Male Birth Date: abt 1881 Christening Date: 10 Nov 1881 Christening Place: Bristol, Gloucestershire, England Father's Name: John George Peard Mother's name: Sarah Ann
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Richard Philip Peard
Name: Richard Philip Peard Gender: Male Birth Date: abt 1885 Christening Date: 26 Nov 1885 Christening Place: Bristol, Gloucestershire, England Father's Name: John Peard Mother's name: Sarah
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Ernest Charles Peard
Name: Ernest Charles Peard Gender: Male Birth Date: abt 1890 Christening Date: Mar 1890 Christening Place: Bristol, Gloucestershire, England Father's Name: John George Peard Mother's name: Sarah Ann
can't find a baptism, but this is shown on a Public Family Tree on ancestry
Frank Peard Birth 18 Feb 1888 in 69 College Street, Bristol
Other Peard children ................
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Henry John Peard
Name: Henry John Peard Gender: Male Birth Date: abt 1879 Christening Date: 28 Aug 1879 Christening Place: Bristol, Gloucestershire, England Father's Name: John George Peard Mother's name: Sarah Ann
Name: Mary Ann Peard Gender: Female Birth Date: abt 1891 Christening Date: 19 Jun 1891 Christening Place: Bristol, Gloucestershire, England Father's Name: John Peard Mother's name: Sarah Ann
My guess is that those children have nothing to do wt=ith Philip Palfrey.
I would guess that John Peard died before 1901, and Philip and Sarah took up together
OR that John or Sarah left the marriage, and Sarah took up with Philip.
You need to find a death certificate for John George Peard to be certain when he died.
I have to go out for the afternoon now, but I'll check back later tonight!
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 22:32 |
Possible death for John Peard
Name: John Peard Estimated Birth Year: abt 1843 Date of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar 1901 Age at Death: 58 Registration district: Bristol Inferred County: Gloucestershire Volume: 6a Page: 50 (click to see others on page)
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 22:39 |
I think that it is possible / probable that YOUR Philip Palfrey did not marry, but that he lived common-law with Sarah Ann Peard (nee Long).
There ae some children there that must have been born after John Peard died, and it is definitely YOUR Philip with Sarah on the 1911 ......... they probably told porkies about the length of their marriage
Actually, on the 1911, it is the length of marriage and number of children for the WIFE not the husband ......
.... so she didn't tell porkies, she was just with a different man!!
sylvia
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 22:50 |
Sylvia - thanks for such a concise wrap!
|
|
Julia
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 23:20 |
Hi Sylvia, Thank you, I will look for the death of John Peard. So Richard P Palfrey may be Palfrey in name only, I suppose only Sarah would have the answer to that one. The mystery deepens! Regards Julia.
|
|
Julia
|
Report
|
17 Jul 2012 23:30 |
Hi Sylvia and MarieCeleste, The most likely death I can find is John Peard died 1901 Bristol age 58 years.
Reagrds Julia.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
18 Jul 2012 04:43 |
MC ..............
................... thank you!
Julia ....................
Any children that were Sarah and John Peard's seem to have used hteir "step-father's" name after Philip and Sarah began living together.
There would have been no official adoption as legal adoptions did not exist before mid-1927.
Stepchildren vary in whether they kept their "own" name or used "step-father's" name .......... and some switched back and forth, almost at will!
In this case ................. Richard Philip Palfrey is indeed a Palfrey only in name as he is Sarah's son by a previous marriage. It looks as though he was comfortable enough with the name to have kept the name into later life.
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
18 Jul 2012 05:35 |
?????? Phillip's death
Deaths Dec 1923 (>99%) PALFREY Phillip 71 Cardiff 11a 467
and Sarah's?????
Deaths Mar 1919 (>99%) Palfrey Sarah A 51 Cardiff 11a 680
If I was doing the family tree, I would classify Richard P and his siblings as step-children of Phil(l)ip Palfrey
sylvia
|