Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Having great difficulty with this lot !! UPDATED
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Flick | Report | 18 Jan 2012 15:22 |
Ancestry links the 1871 census record for Jane to a Jane Smith on the Australian marriages index, to which I do not have access |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 18 Jan 2012 15:30 |
Daughter's birth ?: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 18 Jan 2012 15:33 |
One of the sons: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 18 Jan 2012 15:37 |
Henry and Jane's marriage: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 18 Jan 2012 15:47 |
There were 2 Henry Reeves of about the same age who arrived in Victoria within the right timescale: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 18 Jan 2012 15:57 |
1871: |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Jan 2012 16:22 |
Gosh this is really turning into a mystery with some coincidences. IF it turns out to be the correct Henry what a coincidence that he marries an Elizabeth Smith followed by a Jane Smith in a completely different country. IF again, this is the right fellow, I need to determine whether or not first wife Elizabeth died possibly prior toi his departure to Australia, I will need to search for a death, which I will do this evening...... or whether he committed adultery !! I wouldn't have thought so though as he returned to the same area of Wiltshire from whence he departed and I wouldn't have thought he would dare if first wife was still alive. I need to do a lot more digging and scouting around. I will do this later this evening as other half has just come in from work and will be gasping for coffee and something to eat. Thank you all very much |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Jan 2012 16:29 |
Couldn't reist - looked on freebmd for deaths of Elizabeth Reeves from 1851 to 1857 and found one 1855 regd.Calne. Looked what area it covered and it includes Bremhill where the family lived. I think/hope that this could be her. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 18 Jan 2012 16:32 |
I think you mean bigamy........not adultery....lol! |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 18 Jan 2012 16:34 |
Margaret, I'm not convinced that the Henry Reeves that I've provided the records for is actually the father of William Smith Reeves. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Jan 2012 18:24 |
I have wondered about the Henry and Elizabeth brother and sister on that census return, but at the moment I am noting everything and exploring every avenue and keep an open mind but keeping my fingers crossed at the same time !! |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Jan 2012 19:53 |
In an endeavour to try and get to the bottom of all this, I have looked for Smith/Gleed marriages but couldn't find any. I also then decided to get on tracking Jane Smith 1838 Grays, Essex in order to find her parents and confirm her mother was also Jane (probably later Gleed). However I cannot find a Jane Smith 1838 on either the 1841 or 1851 census and as she was married by 1859 and living in Australia, 1861 is a no-go. The mystery deepens - how can she disappear completely with no trace whatsoever prior to her marriage in Australia ? I am wondering now if she was actually called 'something Jane' and used her second name although I see no reason why she would. I am now going to back-track and see if I can find her mother via her year and place of birth. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 19 Jan 2012 20:11 |
Well I have been on the hunt for Jane Smith Snr - with daughter Jane - on both 1841 and 1851 census. I only found one on 1851 with daughter Jane age 2. This is no good as the Jane (child) we need was born 1838 ! As she married in Oz in 1859, the entry on 1851 is just impossible. So now both Janes have fallen off the edges of the earth !!! Back to the drawing board. |