Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Penny
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 07:25 |
Daughter Marie married a Michael DANAGHER, Sep Qtr 1894 Farnham, He died Deaths Dec 1899 (Danagher Michael 30 Farnham 2a 75 )
then remarried either Forder James George or James Porterfield in late 1901 ( Farnham 2a 224 )
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 12:44 |
Following on from the marriage that Shirley and Penny posted for Maria Danagher (who is the daughter of Eliza Moody/Jessop/Ecclestone and thus the aunt of the two chaps Rose is enquiring about) it looks like she married James Porterfield as James George Forder is with his wife Alice (who would be Alice Rose Hornsby on the marriage record) on the 1911.
However, can't find Maria Porterfield on 1911.
It would be appreciated if Rose would come back and give us some feedback/further input.
|
|
Rosemary
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 17:13 |
Hello Many thanks to you all for you help and info. their Parents were George John Jessop and Clara Agnes Lucas, this is a very confusing familly what with name changes etc, as yet to find out whay they kept changing from one to the other, tho i have a millitary birth cert for George John b.1897 i cant find any record of his birth or death anywhere else. Thanks Rose
|
|
Rosemary
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 17:20 |
Hi Me again the daughter of Eliza is Emma
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 19:05 |
Hi Rosemary, thanks for your message:
"many thank for the info, yes they belong to Greorg John this is a vary confusing familly what with the name change etc. Not just the surname but on my Fathers birth cert it names his father as George John Ecclestone, yet on his marraige cert to my mother it names his father as Frederick George!!! Tho i have a copy of George Johns Millitary Birth cert i cant find a record of his birth or death elsewhere? it is a long story as my father had half brothers and sisters and one half of them believ their Father to be Frederick Regards Rose"
That is odd, as George John b1897 and Frederick George b1895 are brothers? For whatever reason, their father George John snr switched between his birth surname and his mother's second married name and the children just seem to have been called whatever he was at the time.
|
|
Rosemary
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 19:12 |
yes it odd i am struggling
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 19:13 |
I don't know a lot about military births so I'm not sure if they were registered elsewhere, someone else can no doubt advise.
When you say you can't find George John's death do you mean junior or senior, or both? If you have any knowledge of when and where they might have died then we'll have a dig.
On your father's birth certificate, who is his mother? That might help us tie some records down. (She couldn't have been married to both brothers, could she? - that could be one explanation as to how the half brothers and sisters have fathers with those names.)
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 19:19 |
Is this any connection?
British Army WWI Medal Rolls Index Cards, 1914-1920
Name: George J Ecclestone Regiment or Corps: 1st Hampshire Regiment, Oxfordshire & Buckinghamshire Light Infantry Regimental Number: 9511, 33588
Enlisted 23/08/1914. Got the Victory, British and Star medals. Awarded a Clasp of Roses in 1924.
|
|
Rosemary
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 20:00 |
Hi Marieceleste On fathers birth cert his mother is Lily May Ecclestone formerly Musty.
thanks for the millitary info will go and double check
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 20:03 |
Unfortunately Ancestry only has that Medal Roll and no corresponding pension or service record.
So it was George on the marriage:
Surname First name(s) Spouse District Vol Page Marriages Mar 1919 Ecclestone George Musty Walsingham 4b 523 Musty Lily M Ecclestone Walsingham 4b 523
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 20:19 |
Found their father's service record on FMP: British Army Service Records 1760-1915 Transcription First name(s): George John Last name: ECCLESTONE Calculated year of birth: 1869 Parish of birth: Sandhurst Town of birth: Sandhurst County of birth: Berkshire Age at attestation: 35 years 5 months Attestation date: 21 April 1904 Attestation corps: 3RD QUEENS Attestation soldier number: 3495 Discharge rank: Discharge corps: Queen's (Royal West Surrey Regiment) - 2nd Foot Discharge soldier number: The National Archives reference: WO96 / 17 / 34
He stated he had previously been in R Garr Rgt.
His home address was 4 High Street, Farnborough, he had 5 children and his wife was Clara Agnes - so that clears up the confusion about the variation in wife's name on 1911 and the shipping list.
EDIT: There is also another service record for him, there are 48 pages so a lot to plough through! So far, I've noticed it mentions Halifax, NS in 1901 so that could tie in with the family going over there.
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 20:50 |
Right, have read through all 48 pages and I'm not going to attempt to reproduce them here!
George snr first enlisted 10/12/1886. He names his parents as Henry and Mrs Ecclestone. Has a brother Harry, and two sisters - Emma and Maria.
He married his first wife, Lizzie James, 07/11/1892 somewhere that looks like Bordesley.
He married his second wife Clara Agnes Lucas 30/06/1899 in Tipperary.
It also lists all the children's births and baptisms.
|
|
Rosemary
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 20:52 |
Thank you very much.
we had heard they emigrated to canada so it was Halifax Nova Scotia, there is also rumour that thay left at least one of the boys behind because he was ill at the time and he stayed with an aunt? not sure how true this is , i am waiting for an uncle to send me something he has on this but i dont think it has much info on there and they never seem to want to say much about it .
I really appreciate all you help on this thank you
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2011 20:59 |
Rose, I don't think it was really emigration as such, more he had a military posting there and so the family went with him and returned together when he was discharged.
If you look at the 1904 arrival in England from the US that I posted previously they had all 5 children with them, so I don't think there was one left behind in Canada. Now, all of the children are with their aunt in England on the 1901 census. Perhaps they were unable to travel OUT to Canada with their parents, because of illness and then followed over later?
|