Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Robert Bentley
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Dea | Report | 13 Nov 2011 12:59 |
Yes Derek but I am wondering if the 'William' on there is actually 'Joseph' ??? - the age is about right and we know that the real William is much older' - I think the names may have been mixed up somehow?? |
|||
|
Derek | Report | 13 Nov 2011 12:48 |
Dea..I shouldn't bother too much about William's age....Censuses were notoriously inaccurate in that respect...........there's a lot of work being done here....some feedback from peter would be useful!! Trouble with your version of the 1861..shouldn't Joseph 1854 be on it?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 13 Nov 2011 12:44 |
Oops - I see Rootgatherer has gone out - perhaps someone else could take a look at that 1861 for me and I will look forther after lunch. |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 13 Nov 2011 12:42 |
I DO have what I think is the family on 1861 but it needs some work as William's age does not ad up. |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 13 Nov 2011 12:28 |
Sorry Dea I was following you 1851 census but can't find any of them in 1861 yet. At least you have started on lunch!! I have to go out now so I will leave you to find them in 1861. Good Luck. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 13 Nov 2011 12:23 |
Dratt - was going to post that 1871 census but rootgatherer already posted it ages ago while I was making a start on lunch! - I REALLY think it is the correct one - it has the 3 brothers together and the image is VERY difficult to read so Joseph's age may well not say 11! |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 13 Nov 2011 12:05 |
Could that be a second marriage for Robert? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 13 Nov 2011 11:54 |
??? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Derek | Report | 13 Nov 2011 11:48 |
Peter..related to work i have done for you elsewhere on the Hudsons: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 13 Nov 2011 11:45 |
1871 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 13 Nov 2011 11:36 |
'Suspected' parents marriage: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 13 Nov 2011 11:35 |
Well, this looks like the family on 1851 - before Joseph was born: |
|||
|
Derek | Report | 13 Nov 2011 11:17 |
Joseph Bentley..baptised Mansfield Notts 09.04.1854 son of Robert Bentley and Elizabeth nee Davison (Source: Parish records) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 13 Nov 2011 10:40 |
What other info does the marriage cert give please - fathers, occupations, addresses, ages, witnesses etc. |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 13 Nov 2011 10:09 |
|
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 12 Nov 2011 22:44 |
?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 12 Nov 2011 22:37 |
Have you got his date of birth from the IGI entry |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 12 Nov 2011 22:36 |
Not so obvious pre-marriage |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 12 Nov 2011 22:33 |
Presumably?: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 12 Nov 2011 22:25 |
Marriages Sep 1878 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |