Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1901 census please.
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Dudley | Report | 16 Oct 2011 15:11 |
Hi Patchem |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 14 Oct 2011 23:03 |
Henry is born 1851 in 1901 and 1861 in 1911 (because he does not want to appear a lot older than Ellen?) |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:44 |
Dudley |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:42 |
? |
|||
|
Dudley | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:40 |
No she remarried to a George Sotheran and reverted back to Weedon. |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:35 |
Does Ellen remarry using the surname Johns? |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:33 |
I think that Frederick Robert on 1911 census is actually WEEDEN |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dudley | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:28 |
It wqould appear that I can eliminate George/Jane and family . |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:26 |
Oops forgot to refresh |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:26 |
1911 so ages are all different |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:24 |
getting more and more confused |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:23 |
1911 |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:20 |
What is Henry's Father's name on the marriage certificate - or did he not marry? |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:20 |
1911 this is the same family as the 1901 census posted |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dudley | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:08 |
My grandfather was the bootmaker who says on the 1901 and 1911 census he was born in Soho. On the 1911 he says he was married to Ellen. This was not true. One would think that if he was a bootmaker Journeyman in 1901 then he would have had this proffesion in 1891. However I have never been able to find such a person. The daughetr shown on the 1911 census Amelia was my mother. Dud. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:07 |
Dud, just for my old brain! You have obviously worked back to Henry born 1887. How have you done this? Do you have his marriage cert for example, or at least know who he married? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 14 Oct 2011 22:04 |
The Henry in Aldershot in 1901 is a journeyman bootmaker, born 1851. |
|||
|
Dudley | Report | 14 Oct 2011 21:59 |
Assuming this is a different family...where are Henry and Jane and little Henry in 1901.??? |
|||
|
Dudley | Report | 14 Oct 2011 21:57 |
Gliiter Baby. |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 14 Oct 2011 21:56 |
The census that glitterbaby posted for 1901 appears to show a different unrelated Henry, 1887. |