Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Has Witty got the X-Factor

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

RutlandBelle

RutlandBelle Report 9 Sep 2011 15:44

deleted mine from 1851 to avoid confusion!

Maddie

Maddie Report 9 Sep 2011 15:39

1871
????
BEDFORD, James John Head M 53 1818 Surrey VIEW
BEDFORD, Jane Wife F 53 1818 Herefordshire VIEW
BEDFORD, Arthur Thomas Son M 17 1854 Surrey VIEW
BEDFORD, Sarah Ann Daughter F 16 1855 Surrey VIEW
BEDFORD, Charles Son M 13 1858 Middlesex VIEW
BEDFORD, Thomas Walter Son M 8 1863 Surrey VIEW
RG number:
RG10 Piece:
682 Folio:
79 Page:
24

Registration District:
Lambeth Sub District:
Brixton Enumeration District:
7 Ecclesiastical Parish:

Civil Parish:
St Mary Lambeth Municipal Borough:
Address:
Elizabeth Street, St Mary Lambeth County:
London, Surrey

chippie

chippie Report 9 Sep 2011 15:38

Have got this census thanks maddie x

Maddie

Maddie Report 9 Sep 2011 15:37

1851
BEDFORD, James Head Married M 33 1818 Labourer
Mitcham
Surrey VIEW
BEDFORD, Jane Wife Married F 33 1818
Herefordshire VIEW
BEDFORD, James Son M 12 1839
Lambeth
Surrey VIEW
BEDFORD, Jane Daughter F 11 1840
Lambeth
Surrey VIEW
BEDFORD, John Son M 8 1843
Clapham
Surrey VIEW
BEDFORD, George Son M 2 1849
Brixton
Surrey VIEW
BEDFORD, Albert Son M 0 (10 MOS) 1851
Brixton
Surrey VIEW
HIGHLEY, Hannah Head Widow F 64 1787 Formerly School Mistress
St Pancras
Middlesex VIEW
RG number:
HO107 Piece:
1574 Folio:
457 Page:
21

Registration District:
Lambeth Sub District:
Kennington Enumeration District:
21 Ecclesiastical Parish:
St Michaels Stockwell

Civil Parish:
Lambeth Municipal Borough:
Lambeth Address:
5, Ingleton Street, Lambeth County:
Surrey

chippie

chippie Report 9 Sep 2011 15:36

Just believed that i tracked them back. Also got copies of various certificates which i am ploughing through as we talk. x

RutlandBelle

RutlandBelle Report 9 Sep 2011 15:33

how do you know her parent's names?

RutlandBelle

RutlandBelle Report 9 Sep 2011 15:32

Name: James Bedford
Record Type: Death
Estimated Death Date: 16 Dec 1891
Parish or Poor Law Union: Lambeth
Borough: Lambeth
County: London

says he was 71

chippie

chippie Report 9 Sep 2011 15:32

Not sure Rutland Belle Jane Bedford the daughter who was born in 1842 married a charles witty in 1862. The other children in the family i do not recognise.

Edit. Also do not recognise the area of Nicholaston

RutlandBelle

RutlandBelle Report 9 Sep 2011 15:25


London Marriage Banns :

Name: Jane Wheal
Spouse Name: James Bedford
Record Type: Banns
Marriage Bann Date: 19 Mar 1837
Parish: St Mary at Lambeth
County: Surrey
Borough: Lambeth

Maddie

Maddie Report 9 Sep 2011 15:19

a possible
London, England, Births and Baptisms, 1813-1906 about Jane Margaret Bedford
Name: Jane Margaret Bedford
Record Type: Baptism
Estimated Birth Date: abt 1840
Baptism Date: 12 Jan 1840
Father's Name: James John Bedford
Mother's Name: Jane Bedford
Parish or Poor Law Union: Kennington St Mark
Borough: Lambeth

chippie

chippie Report 9 Sep 2011 15:04

Hi I am looking for info on the parents of Jane Bedford she was born 1842 in Lambeth.Her parents were called James and Jane Bedford both born 1818.James in mitcham and Jane in Herefordshire. I am looking for there dates of death and both of there parents names. I have been on freebmd and family search. Any help gratefully received.

Do not no why this is showing as old post and not new post x