Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Trying to find Benjamin Tubess
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Dee | Report | 30 May 2011 20:05 |
Actually, looking back at my notes and alI the census records with the various spellings of Tubess I had found the 1871 with Benjamin and Mary but had discounted it at the time because it put Mary as being born in Middlesex. |
|||
|
ChristinaS | Report | 30 May 2011 20:19 |
If it doesn't mention an X, that means she did sign her name. But, unfortunately, the GRO have sent you a copy which they've written out themselves instead of a photocopy of the original. |
|||
|
Dee | Report | 30 May 2011 20:36 |
Thanks Chrstina, |
|||
|
Nickydownsouth | Report | 30 May 2011 20:43 |
Heres Marys 2 brothers in 1871... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dee | Report | 30 May 2011 22:08 |
Something is nagging at me. Would'nt Mary have been slightly worried that John Tubbs might find out if she had married George bigamously? She must have been quite brazen about it to have spent three weeks waiting for the banns to be called. |
|||
|
Nickydownsouth | Report | 30 May 2011 22:27 |
George and marys weding took place in Croydon...she had lived with John William Tubbs in the Westminster area...what distance is that 10 miles maybe?..... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ChristinaS | Report | 30 May 2011 22:41 |
Bigamy was surprisingly common at that time, due to it being almost impossible to obtain a divorce. |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 31 May 2011 09:41 |
1911 census is signed by Mary Scivier. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dee | Report | 31 May 2011 10:46 |
Thanks girls, |
|||
|
Dee | Report | 31 May 2011 11:32 |
Just got off the phone. Finally got directed to the right registrars office which was the London Borough of Bromley. Spoke to a lovely lady who is going to check the records. Will keep you posted. |
|||
|
ChristinaS | Report | 31 May 2011 12:19 |
I don't think the signatures on the 1911 census and the first marriage certificate are conclusively the same Mary or not, allowing for a 37 year gap between them. What does anyone else think? |
|||
|
ChristinaS | Report | 31 May 2011 13:10 |
Just nudging this up in the hope that someone will take a look |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 31 May 2011 13:29 |
Hi, |
|||
|
Maddie | Report | 31 May 2011 13:32 |
from findmypast |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 31 May 2011 13:42 |
It is possible they could be the same person....look how she signs her " y," with a tail. Looks like she was going to put Georges name in the signature then changed her mind ignoring the extra...look at the" M". |
|||
|
ChristinaS | Report | 31 May 2011 13:50 |
Thanks for looking Vera. I agree with you that the "y" is very similar, and unusual. I don't know what to think. |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 31 May 2011 13:55 |
Very frustrating, surely the original should be somewhere. Which church was she married at, they must have the original in parish records. |
|||
|
ChristinaS | Report | 31 May 2011 14:08 |
It was in Croydon - I don't know which church. This is Dee's thread. Her last entry is above at 11.32 I hope she hears back from Bromley with something positive. |
|||
|
Dee | Report | 31 May 2011 14:09 |
Hi Vera, |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 31 May 2011 14:12 |
Thanks Christina, |