Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
where were you born?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 01:12 |
i must have been writing at same time as you jax! louth is indeed in lincolnshire...but Dundalk(see janeys )is in Co.Louth. Province of Leinster. janeys reasoning about a ships nightwatchman not being home on census day,makes sense too! i found a peter rice in dundalk voting lists..but unfortunately no ages given. 1832 voters list..peter rice>dealer>bridge street. 1842 voters list.peter rice>carrickedmond>dundalk upper. if i can link peter rice and his family to dundalk,i may go down to graveyard in foughart,co louth,where a lot of dundalk people are buried. what are the odds that i could be living about 12mls from where my relatives were buried! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 00:13 |
thank you so so much.....have sent e-mail to ann asking her to check her cert. if she bought it from gov, source,surely it would be complete? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 11 Apr 2011 00:12 |
Louth is in Lincolnshire but the catherine mentioned was born Ireland |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 00:09 |
that got louth down as lincolnshire(where there is a louth) but Dundalk is in Co.Louth. in the Province of Leinster! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 11 Apr 2011 00:07 |
That could be, yes, bk/brk = bricklayer's. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 11 Apr 2011 00:05 |
That's what I meant, Elaine -- moronic Ancestry has transcribed it as Leicestershire but it plainly says Leinster. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 00:01 |
just a sugg...could brk labourer be bricklayers labourer? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 00:01 |
just a sugg...could brk labourer be bricklayers labourer? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:59 |
unfortunately,occupation bit is missing. i will send a message to the other lady and ask if her copy is complete and it only cut the ends off when she sent it to me |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:57 |
janey...think dundalk is in province of leinster,ireland......i'm in n.ireland and dundalk is only 16 miles from me!! could it be leinster,ireland and not leicestershire,england? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:55 |
In 1841 the child in that household is definitely Elizabeth, aged 2. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:50 |
the lady who sent me documents janey,was one i contacted on GR! at least people on here reply to you..i've left a couple of messages on anc. and heard nothing. re the last rice link..if indeed michael was catherines younger brother would he not have still been at home..if she was 14 he would av bin 12, or am i wrong?(wouldnt be for the first time!) btw janey,i should have jane e kellys wedding cert soon..they said 18th april |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:45 |
1851 ?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
**Ann** | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:44 |
Elaine, |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:38 |
How about ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:33 |
But I meant to say -- I think jax may be quite right and Michael is the brother, and the family is from Ireland. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:32 |
Yes, jax, we were typing at the same time ... after I posted the date and location of the child's birth ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:29 |
bit late JC found it already lol |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:29 |
This person in 1861 is the right age; father apparently living but not present: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 10 Apr 2011 23:27 |
I'm not going looking for family trees at Ancestry -- or at other threads. ;) All the info for *this* thread should be in this thread! |
|||
Researching: |